...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl?) with the ON-Q PainBuster? Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
【24h】

A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl?) with the ON-Q PainBuster? Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery

机译:一项随机,多中心,先导研究,比较了布比卡因-胶原蛋白植入物(XaraColl?)与ON-Q PainBuster?的疗效和安全性。妇科开放手术后的术后疼痛缓解系统

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: XaraColl?, a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion of bupivacaine to the wound environment via the ON-Q PainBuster? Post-op Pain Relief System (ON-Q).Methods: We randomized 27 women undergoing open gynecological surgery to receive either three XaraColl implants (each containing 50 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) or ON-Q (900 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride perfused over 72 hours) in a 1:1 ratio. Following surgery, patients had access to intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump as rescue analgesia for the first 24 hours and to oral opioid medication thereafter. Total use of opioid analgesia was compared through 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. Patients also evaluated overall pain control over the 96-hour period using a five-point numeric rating scale. Safety was assessed for 30 days after surgery.Results: XaraColl was non-inferior to ON-Q in total use of opioid analgesia for the first 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery, with a statistical trend towards reduced opioid use in favor of XaraColl over 24, 48, and 72 hours (P = 0.067, 0.100, and 0.089, respectively). The time to first use of opioid analgesia was also significantly delayed in patients treated with XaraColl (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between groups in patients’ evaluation of pain control or their satisfaction with the treatment in general. Both treatments were considered safe and well tolerated.Conclusion: Despite using only 17% of the ON-Q dose, XaraColl is as effective as ON-Q in providing postoperative analgesia for 4 days after open gynecological surgery. These preliminary findings suggest that XaraColl offers great potential for the management of postoperative pain and warrants further definitive studies.
机译:背景:XaraColl?是一种基于胶原的术中植入物,正在将布比卡因输送到手术创伤部位,目前正在开发用于术后镇痛的药物。我们比较了XaraColl通过ON-Q PainBuster对术后伤口疼痛的预防和相对于术后布比卡因缓慢灌注到伤口环境的有效性和安全性。术后疼痛缓解系统(ON-Q)方法:我们将27例接受开放式妇科手术的妇女随机分配为接受三个XaraColl植入物(每个均含50 mg布比卡因盐酸盐)或ON-Q(900 mg布比卡因盐酸盐在72小时内灌注)以1:1的比例。手术后,患者在最初的24小时内可通过患者控制的镇痛泵获得静脉吗啡作为抢救性镇痛,然后口服阿片类药物。在手术后24、48、72和96小时比较了阿片类镇痛的总使用量。患者还使用五点数字评分量表评估了96小时内的总体疼痛控制。评估术后30天的安全性。结果:在手术后的头24、48、72和96小时,XaraColl在使用阿片类药物的总镇痛方面不逊于ON-Q,且统计趋势表明阿片类药物的使用减少XaraColl在24、48和72小时内的优势(分别为P = 0.067、0.100和0.089)。在XaraColl治疗的患者中,首次使用阿片类镇痛的时间也显着延迟(P = 0.024)。两组患者对疼痛控制或对治疗的总体满意度没有显着差异。结论:尽管仅使用ON-Q剂量的17%,但XaraColl在开放式妇科手术后4天的术后镇痛效果与ON-Q一样有效。这些初步发现表明,XaraColl为术后疼痛的治疗提供了巨大的潜力,值得进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号