首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
【24h】

Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients

机译:定量感官测试可测量急诊科患者的个体疼痛反应

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in perception of fixed painful stimuli would explain individual variation in reported pain and response to treatment among ED patients. Materials and methods: In three studies, we 1) describe performance characteristics of brief quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 50 healthy volunteers, 2) test effects of 10 mg oxycodone versus placebo on QST measures in 18 healthy volunteers, and 3) measure interindividual differences in nociception and treatment responses in 198 ED patients with a painful complaint during ED treatment. QST measures adapted for use in the ED included pressure sensation threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), pressure pain response (PPR), and cold pain tolerance (CPT) tests. Results: First, all QST measures had high inter-rater reliability and test–retest reproducibility. Second, 10 mg oxycodone reduced PPR, increased PPT, and prolonged CPT. Third, baseline PPT and PPR revealed hyperalgesia in 31 (16%) ED subjects relative to healthy volunteers. In 173 (88%) ED subjects who completed repeat testing 30 minutes after pain treatment, PPT increased and PPR decreased (Cohen’s dz 0.10–0.19). Verbal pain scores (0–10) for the ED complaint decreased by 2.2 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.9, 2.6) (Cohen’s dz 0.97) but did not covary with the changes in PPT and PPR (r=0.05–0.13). Treatment effects were greatest in ED subjects with a history of treatment for anxiety or depression (Cohen’s dz 0.26–0.43) or with baseline hyperalgesia (Cohen’s dz 0.40–0.88). Conclusion: QST reveals individual differences in perception of fixed painful stimuli in ED patients, including hyperalgesia. Subgroups of ED patients with hyperalgesia and psychiatric history report larger treatment effects on ED pain and QST measures.
机译:背景:急诊科急诊科对急性疼痛的改善和个性化治疗是当务之急,因为痛苦的抱怨是急诊就诊的最常见原因。很少有工具可以客观地评估ED环境中的疼痛感。我们推测,固定疼痛刺激的感知差异可以解释ED患者中所报告的疼痛和对治疗反应的个体差异。材料和方法:在三项研究中,我们(1)描述了50名健康志愿者的简短定量感觉测试(QST)的表现特征; 2)10 mg羟考酮和安慰剂对18名健康志愿者的QST衡量的影响;以及3)个体间衡量在198例ED治疗期间出现疼痛症状的ED患者的伤害感受和治疗反应方面的差异。适用于急诊科的QST措施包括压力感觉阈值,压力疼痛阈值(PPT),压力疼痛反应(PPR)和冷痛耐受性(CPT)测试。结果:首先,所有QST措施均具有较高的评定者间可靠性和重测重现性。其次,10 mg羟考酮可降低PPR,增加PPT和延长CPT。第三,相对于健康志愿者,基线PPT和PPR在31名(16%)ED受试者中显示出痛觉过敏。在疼痛治疗后30分钟完成重复测试的173名(88%)ED受试者中,PPT增加而PPR降低(Cohen d z 0.10–0.19)。 ED投诉的言语疼痛评分(0-10)下降了2.2(95%置信区间[CI]:1.9,2.6)(Cohen d z 0.97),但与PPT的变化无关和PPR(r = 0.05-0.13)。在有焦虑或抑郁症治疗史(Cohen d z 0.26-0.43)或基线痛觉过敏(Cohen d z 0.40-0.88)的ED患者中,治疗效果最大。 。结论:QST揭示了包括痛觉过敏在内的ED患者对固定疼痛刺激的感知个体差异。患有痛觉过敏和精神病史的ED患者亚组报告对ED疼痛和QST措施的治疗效果更大。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号