首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition
【24h】

Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition

机译:疼痛敏感性和内源性疼痛抑制实验方法中的性别差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract: It has been suggested that increased pain sensitivity and disruption of endogenous pain inhibitory processes may account, at least in part, for the greater prevalence and severity of chronic pain in women compared to men. However, previous studies addressing this topic have produced mixed findings. This study examined sex differences in pain sensitivity and inhibition using quantitative sensory testing (QST), while also considering the influence of other important factors such as depressive symptoms and sleep quality. Healthy men (n=24) and women (n=24) each completed a QST battery. This battery included an ischemic pain task (IPT) that used a submaximal effort tourniquet procedure as well as a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) procedure for the assessment of endogenous pain inhibition. Prior to QST, participants completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Analyses revealed significant sex differences for the ischemic pain task and the conditioned pain modulation procedure, such that women tolerated the ischemic pain for a shorter amount of time and demonstrated less pain inhibition compared with men. This remained true even when accounting for sex differences in depressive symptoms and sleep quality. The results of this study suggest that women may be more pain sensitive and possess less-efficient endogenous pain inhibitory capacity compared with men. Whether interventions that decrease pain sensitivity and enhance pain inhibition in women ultimately improve their clinical pain outcomes is an area of research that deserves additional attention in the future.
机译:摘要:有人提出,与男性相比,女性增加的疼痛敏感性和破坏内源性疼痛抑制过程至少可以部分解释慢性疼痛的患病率和严重性。但是,以前针对该主题的研究得出了不同的结论。这项研究使用定量感觉测试(QST)研究了疼痛敏感性和抑制力的性别差异,同时还考虑了其​​他重要因素(如抑郁症状和睡眠质量)的影响。健康的男性(n = 24)和女性(n = 24)均完成了QST电池。该电池包括缺血性疼痛任务(IPT),该任务使用了最大的止血带程序和条件性疼痛调节(CPM)程序来评估内源性疼痛抑制。在进行QST之前,参与者完成了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数。分析显示,缺血性疼痛任务和条件性疼痛调节程序存在明显的性别差异,因此与男性相比,女性耐受缺血性疼痛的时间更短,并且对疼痛的抑制作用也较小。即使考虑到抑郁症状和睡眠质量的性别差异,这一点仍然成立。这项研究的结果表明,与男性相比,女性对疼痛的敏感性更高,对内源性疼痛的抑制能力更低。降低女性疼痛敏感性并增强疼痛抑制效果的干预措施最终能否改善其临床疼痛结局,是一个值得研究的领域,在未来,这一领域值得进一步关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号