首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system
【24h】

Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system

机译:在丁丙诺啡透皮系统治疗中度至重度慢性疼痛期间使用速释阿片类药物作为辅助镇痛药

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) is approved in the US for the management of chronic pain. Due to its high affinity for μ-opioid receptors with a slow dissociation profile, buprenorphine may potentially displace or prevent the binding of competing μ-opioid-receptor agonists, including immediate-release (IR) opioids, in a dose-dependent manner. Health care professionals may assume that the use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during BTDS therapy is not acceptable. Materials and methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated the use of IR opioids as supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate–severe chronic pain with BTDS at 52 US sites (BUP3015S, NCT01125917). Patients were categorized into IR-opioid and no-IR-opioid groups. At each visit of the extension phase, adverse events, concomitant medications, and information from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were recorded. Results: The most common supplemental IR opioids prescribed during BTDS treatment (n=354) were hydrocodone–acetaminophen and oxycodone–acetaminophen. The mean daily dose of IR opioids (morphine equivalents) for supplemental analgesia was 22 mg. At baseline, BPI – pain intensity and BPI – interference scores were higher for patients in the IR-opioid group. In both treatment groups, scores improved by week 4, and then were maintained throughout 6 months of the open-label extension trial. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Patients who were prescribed IR opioids reported lower scores for BPI pain intensity and pain interference to levels similar to patients receiving BTDS without IR opioids, without increasing the rate or severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Patients prescribed concomitant use of IR opioids with BTDS had greater treatment persistence. The results of this post hoc analysis provide support for the concomitant use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate–severe chronic pain with BTDS.
机译:背景:丁丙诺啡透皮系统(BTDS)在美国已获准用于治疗慢性疼痛。由于丁丙诺啡对缓慢解离的μ阿片受体具有高亲和力,因此可能以剂量依赖的方式取代或阻止竞争性μ阿片受体激动剂(包括速释(IR)阿片类)的结合。卫生保健专业人员可能会认为在BTDS治疗期间不宜将IR阿片类药物用于辅助镇痛。材料和方法:这项事后分析评估了在美国52个地点(BUP3015S,NCT01125917)用BTDS处理中度至重度慢性疼痛期间使用IR阿片类药物作为辅助镇痛的情况。将患者分为IR阿片类药物和非IR阿片类药物。在扩展阶段的每次访视中,记录不良事件,伴随用药以及简短疼痛清单(BPI)的信息。结果:BTDS治疗期间处方的最常见补充IR阿片类药物(n = 354)为氢可酮-对乙酰氨基酚和羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚。补充镇痛用IR阿片类药物(吗啡当量)的平均日剂量为22 mg。在基线时,IR阿片类药物患者的BPI –疼痛强度和BPI –干扰评分较高。在两个治疗组中,评分均在第4周时有所改善,然后在开放标签扩展试验的整个6个月中保持不变。两组中治疗紧急事件的发生率相似。结论:处方IR阿片类药物的患者报告的BPI疼痛强度和疼痛干扰评分较低,与未接受IR阿片类药物的BTDS患者相似,且未增加治疗紧急不良事件的发生率或严重性。处方同时使用IR阿片类药物和BTDS的患者具有更大的治疗持久性。事后分析的结果为在使用BTDS治疗中度至重度慢性疼痛期间同时使用IR阿片类药物来辅助镇痛提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号