首页> 外文OA文献 >Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system
【2h】

Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system

机译:丁丙诺啡透皮系统在中度至重度慢性疼痛处理中使用速释阿片类药物作为辅助镇痛药

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) is approved in the US for the management of chronic pain. Due to its high affinity for mu-opioid receptors with a slow dissociation profile, buprenorphine may potentially displace or prevent the binding of competing mu-opioid-receptor agonists, including immediate-release (IR) opioids, in a dose-dependent manner. Health care professionals may assume that the use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during BTDS therapy is not acceptable. Materials and methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated the use of IR opioids as supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS at 52 US sites (BUP3015S, NCT01125917). Patients were categorized into IR-opioid and no-IR-opioid groups. At each visit of the extension phase, adverse events, concomitant medications, and information from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were recorded. Results: The most common supplemental IR opioids prescribed during BTDS treatment (n=354) were hydrocodone-acetaminophen and oxycodone-acetaminophen. The mean daily dose of IR opioids (morphine equivalents) for supplemental analgesia was 22 mg. At baseline, BPI pain intensity and BPI - interference scores were higher for patients in the IR-opioid group. In both treatment groups, scores improved by week 4, and then were maintained throughout 6 months of the open-label extension trial. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in both groups. Conclusion: Patients who were prescribed IR opioids reported lower scores for BPI pain intensity and pain interference to levels similar to patients receiving BTDS without IR opioids, without increasing the rate or severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Patients prescribed concomitant use of IR opioids with BTDS had greater treatment persistence. The results of this post hoc analysis provide support for the concomitant use of IR opioids for supplemental analgesia during the management of moderate-severe chronic pain with BTDS.
机译:背景:丁丙诺啡透皮系统(BTDS)在美国已获批准用于治疗慢性疼痛。由于丁丙诺啡对具有缓慢解离作用的mu阿片受体具有很高的亲和力,因此它可能以剂量依赖的方式取代或阻止竞争性mu阿片受体激动剂(包括速释(IR)阿片类)的结合。卫生保健专业人员可能会认为在BTDS治疗期间不宜将IR阿片类药物用于辅助镇痛。材料和方法:这项事后分析评估了在美国52个地点(BUP3015S,NCT01125917)用BTDS处理中度重度慢性疼痛期间使用IR阿片类药物作为辅助镇痛的情况。将患者分为IR阿片类药物和非IR阿片类药物。在扩展阶段的每次拜访中,记录不良事件,伴随用药以及简短疼痛清单(BPI)的信息。结果:BTDS治疗期间处方的最常见补充IR阿片类药物(n = 354)为氢可酮-对乙酰氨基酚和羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚。补充镇痛的IR阿片类药物(吗啡当量)的日平均剂量为22 mg。基线时,IR阿片类药物组的BPI疼痛强度和BPI-干扰评分较高。在两个治疗组中,评分都在第4周时有所改善,然后在开放标签扩展试验的整个6个月中保持不变。两组中治疗紧急不良事件的发生率相似。结论:处方IR阿片类药物的患者报告的BPI疼痛强度和疼痛干扰评分较低,与未接受IR阿片类药物的BTDS患者相似,且未增加治疗紧急不良事件的发生率或严重性。处方同时使用IR阿片类药物和BTDS的患者具有更大的治疗持久性。事后分析的结果为在使用BTDS治疗中重度慢性疼痛期间同时使用IR阿片类药物来辅助镇痛提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号