...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Documentation of Oral Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy Plans in Patients With Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
【24h】

Documentation of Oral Versus Intravenous Chemotherapy Plans in Patients With Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

机译:转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的口服对静脉化疗方案的文件

获取原文

摘要

AbstractDocumentation of discussions regarding the goals and course of chemotherapy administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC does not meet ASCO QOPI quality standards, especially for individuals prescribed oral agents. Purpose: Using the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) guidelines for assessing quality cancer care, we examined differences in clinician documentation of patient consent and treatment plans for oral versus intravenous chemotherapy among patients with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the electronic health records of 175 patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC whose initial systemic treatment consisted of either oral or intravenous chemotherapy. Specifically, we collected data on whether oncology clinicians documented discussions of the intent of chemotherapy (eg, palliative v curative), the number of cycles or anticipated duration of the chemotherapy, and patient consent for the chemotherapy in the practitioner note. Results: Of the 175 patients in the sample (54.3% female; mean age = 61.96 years, standard deviation = 10.81 years), 119 (68%) received intravenous chemotherapy, and 56 (32%) were prescribed oral agents for first-line chemotherapy. Compared with those who received intravenous chemotherapy, patients prescribed oral chemotherapy had lower rates of documented treatment plans, including intent (23.3% v 45.4%, P = .005) and anticipated duration of therapy (8.9% v 32.8%, P = .001). The rate of documentation of discussions regarding patient consent for chemotherapy did not differ significantly between groups (57.1% v 69.7, P = .13). Conclusion: Documentation of discussions regarding the goals and course of chemotherapy administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC does not meet ASCO QOPI quality standards, especially for individuals prescribed oral agents. Considering the increasing numbers of targeted oral therapies used in oncology practice, further work is needed to ensure appropriate discussion and documentation of chemotherapy plans.
机译:摘要关于转移性NSCLC患者化疗目标和过程的讨论文档不符合ASCO QOPI质量标准,特别是对于口服处方药的个体。目的:使用ASCO质量肿瘤实践计划(QOPI)指南评估高质量的癌症护理,我们研究了转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在患者同意书以及口服和静脉化疗方案之间的临床医生差异。 。材料和方法:我们对175例诊断为转移性NSCLC的患者的电子健康记录进行了回顾性研究,其最初的全身治疗包括口服或静脉内化疗。具体来说,我们收集了有关肿瘤临床医生是否记录了关于化疗目的(例如姑息治疗),周期数或预期化疗持续时间以及患者对化疗的同意的讨论的数据。结果:在样本的175例患者中(女性54.3%;平均年龄= 61.96岁,标准差= 10.81岁),其中119例(68%)接受了静脉化疗,一线处方的口服药物为56例(32%)化学疗法。与接受静脉化疗的患者相比,处方口服化疗的患者记录的治疗计划发生率较低,包括意图治疗(23.3%vs 45.4%,P = .005)和预期治疗持续时间(8.9%vs 32.8%,P = .001)。 )。两组之间关于患者同意化疗的讨论的文献记录率没有显着差异(57.1%vs 69.7,P = .13)。结论:关于转移性NSCLC患者化疗目标和过程的讨论文档不符合ASCO QOPI质量标准,特别是对于开处方口服制剂的患者。考虑到在肿瘤学实践中使用的靶向口服疗法的数量不断增加,需要做进一步的工作以确保对化疗方案进行适当的讨论和记录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号