首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Tumor Board Participation Among Physicians Caring for Patients With Lung or Colorectal Cancer
【24h】

Tumor Board Participation Among Physicians Caring for Patients With Lung or Colorectal Cancer

机译:照顾肺癌或大肠癌患者的内科医师参与肿瘤委员会

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Among patients with lung or colorectal cancer, frequent physician tumor board engagement was associated with patient clinical trial participation and higher rates of curative-intent surgery for stage I to II NSCLC but not with overall survival. Purpose: Multidisciplinary tumor board meetings are common in cancer care, but limited evidence is available about their benefits. We assessed the associations of tumor board participation and structure with care delivery and patient outcomes. Methods: As part of the CanCORS study, we surveyed 1,601 oncologists and surgeons about participation in tumor boards and specific tumor board features. Among 4,620 patients with lung or colorectal cancer diagnosed from 2003 to 2005 and seen by 1,198 of these physicians, we assessed associations of tumor board participation with patient survival, clinical trial enrollment, guideline-recommended care, and patient-reported quality, adjusting for patient and physician characteristics. Results: Weekly physician tumor board participation (v participation less often or never) was not associated with patient survival, although in exploratory subgroup analyses, weekly participation was associated with lower mortality for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer and stage IV colorectal cancer. Patients treated by the 54% of physicians participating in tumor boards weekly (v less often or never) were more likely to enroll onto clinical trials (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.2). Patients with stage I to II non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose physicians participated in tumor boards weekly were more likely to undergo curative-intent surgery (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.8), although those with stage I to II NSCLC whose physicians' meetings reviewed one cancer site were less likely to undergo curative-intent surgery (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.4). Conclusion: Among patients with lung or colorectal cancer, frequent physician tumor board engagement was associated with patient clinical trial participation and higher rates of curative-intent surgery for stage I to II NSCLC but not with overall survival.
机译:摘要在肺癌或大肠癌患者中,频繁的医师肿瘤介入治疗与患者的临床试验参与以及I至II期非小细胞肺癌的治愈性手术率较高有关,但与总体生存率无关。目的:在癌症治疗中通常会召开多学科的肿瘤委员会会议,但是关于其益处的证据有限。我们评估了肿瘤板参与度和结构与护理服务和患者预后的关系。方法:作为CanCORS研究的一部分,我们对1,601位肿瘤科医生和外科医生进行了有关肿瘤板参与和特定肿瘤板特征的调查。在2003年至2005年诊断出的4,620例肺癌或结直肠癌患者中,有1,198位医生就诊了该患者,我们评估了肿瘤委员会参与程度与患者生存率,临床试验入组,指南推荐的护理以及患者报告的质量(针对患者进行调整)的相关性和医生的特征。结果:尽管在探索性亚组分析中,每周医师参与肿瘤板会议(较少参与或从未参与)与患者生存率无关,尽管广泛参与的小细胞肺癌和IV期结直肠癌的每周参与与较低的死亡率相关。由54%的每周参加肿瘤委员会医师治疗的患者(较少或很少或很少)参加临床试验的可能性更高(优势比[OR]为1.6; 95%CI为1.1至2.2)。医师每周参加肿瘤委员会的I至II期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者更可能接受根治性手术(OR为2.9; 95%CI为1.3至6.8) I至II级非小细胞肺癌的医师会议回顾了>一个癌症部位接受根治性手术的可能性较小(OR为0.1; 95%CI为0.03至0.4)。结论:在肺癌或结直肠癌患者中,频繁的医师肿瘤介入治疗与患者的临床试验参与和I至II期NSCLC的有针对性的手术率较高有关,但与总体生存率无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号