...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Is FDA-Approved Bevacizumab Cost-Effective When Included in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?
【24h】

Is FDA-Approved Bevacizumab Cost-Effective When Included in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?

机译:当纳入抗铂类复发性卵巢癌的治疗中时,FDA批准的贝伐单抗是否具有成本效益?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

AbstractPurpose:Although the Food and Drug Administration has approved incorporation of bevacizumab (BEV) into the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), cost-value measures are an essential consideration, as evidenced by the recent ASCO Value Framework initiative. We assessed the cost-effectiveness and reviewed the net health benefit (NHB) of this expensive treatment.Methods:A cost-effectiveness decision model was constructed using results from a phase III trial comparing BEV plus cytotoxic chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with PROC. The Avastin Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival and quality of life in patients receiving BEV. Costs, paracentesis rates, and adverse events were incorporated, including subgroup analysis of different partner chemotherapy agents.Results:Inclusion of BEV in the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer meets the common willingness-to-pay incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold of $100,000 per progression-free life-year saved (LYS) for 15-mg/kg dosing and approaches this threshold for 10-mg/kg dosing, with an ICER of $160,000. In sensitivity analysis, reducing the cost of BEV by 13% (from $9,338 to $8,100 per cycle) allows 10-mg/kg dosing to reach a $100,000 ICER. Exploratory analysis of different BEV chemotherapy partners showed an ICER of $76,000 per progression-free LYS (6.5-month progression-free survival improvement) and $54,000 per LYS (9.1-month overall survival improvement) for the addition of BEV to paclitaxel once per week. Using the ASCO framework for value assessment, the NHB score for BEV plus paclitaxel once per week is 48.Conclusion:Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 ICER, the addition of BEV to chemotherapy either demonstrates or approaches cost-effectiveness and NHB when added to the treatment of patients with PROC.
机译:摘要目的:尽管食品药品监督管理局已批准将贝伐单抗(BEV)纳入对铂类耐药性卵巢癌(PROC)的治疗中,但成本价值措施是必不可少的考虑因素,最近的ASCO价值框架计划就证明了这一点。我们评估了这种昂贵治疗的成本效益并审查了其净健康收益(NHB)。方法:采用一项III期试验的结果,建立了成本效益决策模型,比较了BEV加细胞毒性化疗与单纯化疗对PROC患者的影响。在抗铂类上皮性卵巢癌(AURELIA)试验中使用Avastin证明,接受BEV的患者的无进展生存期和生活质量得到改善。结果:纳入了成本,穿刺率和不良事件,包括对不同配伍化疗药物的亚组分析。结果:将BEV纳入铂耐药性复发性卵巢癌的治疗符合通用的付费支付成本效益比(ICER) )对于15 mg / kg剂量,每无进展生存年(LYS)可节省100,000美元,并达到10 mg / kg剂量此阈值,ICER为160,000美元。在敏感性分析中,将BEV的成本降低13%(每个周期从9,338美元降至8,100美元),使10 mg / kg的剂量可达到100,000美元的ICER。对不同BEV化疗伙伴的探索性分析显示,每周向紫杉醇中添加BEV一次,每无进展LYS的ICER为$ 76,000(无6.5个月无进展生存期改善),每LYS为$ 54,000(总有9.1个月总生存期改善)。使用ASCO进行价值评估的框架,每周BEV +紫杉醇的NHB评分为48分。结论:使用愿意支付的门槛为$ 100,000 ICER,将BEV加入化学疗法可证明或接近成本效益和NHB当加到PROC患者的治疗中时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号