Comparative efficacy of tandem autologous versus autologous followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

摘要

Background Despite advances in understanding of clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of multiple myeloma (MM) and availability of more effective therapies, MM remains incurable. The autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) strategy is based on combining cytoreduction from high-dose (chemo- or chemoradio)-therapy with adoptive immunotherapy. However, conflicting results have been reported when an auto-allo HCT approach is compared to tandem autologous (auto-auto) HCT. A previously published meta-analysis has been reported; however, it suffers from serious methodological flaws. Methods A systematic search identified 152 publications, of which five studies (enrolling 1538 patients) met inclusion criteria. All studies eligible for inclusion utilized biologic randomization. Results Assessing response rates by achievement of at least a very good partial response did not differ among the treatment arms [risk ratio (RR) (95% CI)?=?0.97 (0.87-1.09), p?=?0.66]; but complete remission was higher in the auto-allo HCT arm [RR?=?1.65 (1.25-2.19), p?=?0.0005]. Event-free survival did not differ between auto-allo HCT group versus auto-auto HCT group using per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (HR)?=?0.78 (0.58-1.05)), p?=?0.11] or using intention-to-treat analysis [HR?=?0.83 (0.60-1.15), p?=?0.26]. Overall survival (OS) did not differ among these treatment arms whether analyzed on per-protocol [HR?=?0.88 (0.33-2.35), p?=?0.79], or by intention-to-treat [HR?=?0.80 (0.48-1.32), p?=?0.39] analysis. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly worse with auto-allo HCT [RR (95%CI)?=?3.55 (2.17-5.80), p?