首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy >Web-Based Survey to Assess the Perceptions of Managed Care Organization Representatives on Use of Copay Subsidy Coupons for Prescription Drugs
【24h】

Web-Based Survey to Assess the Perceptions of Managed Care Organization Representatives on Use of Copay Subsidy Coupons for Prescription Drugs

机译:基于网络的调查,以评估管理医疗组织代表对处方药共付额补助券使用的看法

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Promotion of prescription drug coupons and vouchers by pharmaceutical manufacturers has increased in recent years. These coupons and vouchers usually subsidize patients’ cost-sharing obligations. In other words, drug companies pay for a patient’s portion of the drug cost, and the remaining cost is paid by the patient and the patient’s health plan. This practice is normally used for brand name drugs but can and has been used for generic drugs. Copayments (also known as copays), and especially high copays for higher cost drugs, are used by managed care organizations (MCOs) to place a higher financial burden on patients and also provide an appreciation of the medication cost. At the same time, tiered copay plans offer incentives, in the form of lower copays, to use available equivalent generic alternatives or lower cost brand name drugs, instead of high cost brand name drugs. With higher tiered copays for brand name drugs being offset by coupons, little is known about MCO representatives’ perceptions about the use of copay subsidy coupons for brand name prescription drugs. OBJECTIVE: To assess health plan managers’ and pharmacy benefit managers’ (PBMs) perceptions about the use of prescription drug copay subsidy coupons. METHODS: A 28-item online survey instrument was used to collect data from health plan and PBM representatives. A sample of 834 MCO representatives was selected from the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy membership directory. Pharmacists, managers, directors, and executive officers working in pharmacy, formulary, and clinical pharmacy operations were selected for the survey. Respondents from non-MCO settings and government-sponsored health plans were excluded from the survey. RESULTS: A total of 122 surveys were returned after 3 emails (i.e., an invitation and 2 reminder emails) of which 105 were usable surveys, giving a response rate of 13.7%. A 5-point, 11-item Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree and 5=Strongly Agree) was used to measure respondents’ perceptions toward prescription drug coupons. Some items referred to coupons used repeatedly over a year to get copay discounts (i.e., long-term use coupons) whereas some items referred to coupons distributed for trial purposes (i.e., short-term use coupons). Of the 105 respondents, 100 (95.2%) agreed that copay subsidy coupons encouraged nonpreferred brand name drugs over preferred brand name drugs. A total of 102 (97.2%) respondents agreed that brand name drug coupons undermined tiered formulary structure. Ninety-two (87.6%) respondents agreed that short-term use coupons increased plan sponsor’s costs while 96 (91.5%) respondents agreed that sponsor cost increased with long-term use coupons. A total of 68 (64.8%) agreed that short-term use coupons should be eliminated whereas 78 (74.3%) respondents agreed that long-term use coupons should be eliminated. CONCLUSION: Among MCOs’ many business activities are efforts to contain rising pharmacy costs. The results of this survey indicate that MCO representatives believe that incentive programs such as prescription drug coupons and vouchers lead to an increase in brand name drug utilization, which undermines their formulary controls and, in turn, can be expected to increase overall health care costs.
机译:背景:近年来,药品制造商对处方药优惠券和代金券的促销有所增加。这些优惠券和优惠券通常补贴患者的费用分摊义务。换句话说,药品公司要支付患者一部分药品费用,而剩余的费用则由患者和患者的健康计划支付。这种做法通常用于品牌药,但可以并且已经用于仿制药。共付额(也称为共付额),尤其是较高成本药物的高共付额,被管理医疗组织(MCO)用于给患者带来更高的经济负担,并增加了药物成本。同时,分级共付额计划会以较低的共付额形式提供激励,鼓励他们使用可用的同等仿制药替代品或成本较低的品牌药来代替成本较高的品牌药。由于品牌药的较高共付额被优惠券所抵销,因此,对于MCO代表对于将共付额补贴优惠券用于品牌处方药的看法知之甚少。目的:评估健康计划经理和药房福利经理(PBM)对使用处方药共付补贴券的看法。方法:使用28项在线调查工具从健康计划和PBM代表收集数据。从管理护理药房学会会员目录中选出834名MCO代表作为样本。选择了从事药房,处方药和临床药房运营的药剂师,经理,董事和执行官进行调查。来自非MCO环境和政府赞助的健康计划的受访者被排除在调查之外。结果:在收到3封电子邮件(即邀请和2封提醒电子邮件)后,总共返回了122份调查问卷,其中105份是可用的调查问卷,答复率为13.7%。使用5点11项李克特量表(1 =完全不同意,5 =完全同意)来衡量受访者对处方药优惠券的看法。一些项目涉及优惠券,该优惠券在一年中反复使用以获得共付额折扣(即长期使用优惠券),而某些项目则涉及为试用目的分发的优惠券(即短期使用优惠券)。在105位受访者中,有100位(95.2%)同意共付补贴券鼓励使用非首选品牌药而不是首选品牌药。共有102位(97.2%)的受访者同意,品牌药券破坏了分层配方结构。百分之九十二(87.6%)的受访者同意短期使用优惠券会增加计划赞助商的费用,而96(91.5%)的受访者则认为长期使用优惠券会增加赞助商费用。共有68个(64.8%)同意应删除短期使用优惠券,而78个(74.3%)的受访者同意应删除长期使用优惠券。结论:在MCO的许多业务活动中,都在努力控制不断上涨的药房成本。这项调查的结果表明,MCO代表认为,诸如处方药优惠券和代金券之类的激励计划会导致品牌药物利用的增加,这会破坏其处方控制,进而有望增加总体医疗保健成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号