...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of integrative environmental sciences >Exam?ning impacts of natural sciences education in comparison with health and soc?al sciences for pro-environmental behaviours in Turkey
【24h】

Exam?ning impacts of natural sciences education in comparison with health and soc?al sciences for pro-environmental behaviours in Turkey

机译:检验自然科学教育与健康和社会科学相比对土耳其亲环境行为的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Analysis of academic programmes has become very important for pro-environmental behaviours; however, impacts of natural, social and health sciences education for environmental knowledge and behaviours have not been investigated yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine these impacts on environmental knowledge and relation with environmental behaviours of 706 university students. According to findings of study, health sciences students differed from other groups in environmental knowledge, however, no differences in terms of behaviours. Another major finding is: there is a statistically significant negative correlation between environmental behaviour and environmental knowledge for all students and especially for ‘health sciences’ (r ?=???0.208; p ??0.01) and ‘natural sciences’ students (r ?=???0.131; p ??0.05), contrary to our expectations. For items supporting ‘consumer behaviours’, majority of students indicated they had engaged in environmentally protective behaviours. For example, ‘90.4% stated to turn off unneccessary lights’ (item 4); 79.1% tried to use both sides of papers (item 12) and 77.9% preferred public transportation (item 5). However, these high scores could be interpreted in terms of economical benefits rather than behaving environmentally. In conclusion, students did not have ‘internalized ethical values’ enabling them to behave actually environmental way by feeling themselves as part of nature.
机译:对学术计划的分析对于环保行为已经变得非常重要。但是,尚未研究自然,社会和健康科学教育对环境知识和行为的影响。因此,本研究的目的是研究这些对706名大学生的环境知识及其与环境行为的关系的影响。根据研究结果,健康科学专业的学生在环境知识方面与其他群体不同,但是行为方面没有差异。另一个主要发现是:所有学生,特别是“健康科学”的学生,在环境行为和环境知识之间存在统计上显着的负相关性( r == 0.208; p <0.01),并且“自然科学”学生( r == 0.131; p = <0.05),与我们的预期相反。对于支持“消费者行为”的物品,大多数学生表示他们从事环境保护行为。例如,“ 90.4%表示要关闭不必要的灯”(项目4); 79.1%的人试图同时使用纸张的两面(项目12),而77.9%的人则偏爱使用公共交通工具(项目5)。但是,这些高分可以用经济利益来解释,而不是在环境方面。总之,学生没有“内在的道德价值观”,他们无法通过将自己视为大自然的一部分来实际以环境方式行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号