首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Protection >Design and Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Plant Types (Activated Sludge and Membrane Bioreactor), Using GPS-X Simulation Program: Case Study of Tikrit WWTP (Middle Iraq)
【24h】

Design and Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Plant Types (Activated Sludge and Membrane Bioreactor), Using GPS-X Simulation Program: Case Study of Tikrit WWTP (Middle Iraq)

机译:使用GPS-X模拟程序设计和比较废水处理厂类型(活性污泥和膜生物反应器):提克里特污水处理厂的案例研究(伊拉克中部)

获取原文
       

摘要

Mathematical models and simulation are considered a powerful tool in engineering practice. Those tools are becoming increasingly used for the improvement of wastewater treatment plants design because the conceptual design is complex and ill-defined. In this paper, three alternatives: 1) complete mix activated sludge without nitrogen removal (CAS); 2) complete mix activated sludge with nitrogen removal (CAS-N) and; 3) membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes were designed into two steps: first concept design to calculate the size of process units, then second implement modeling and simulation to improve the accuracy of the conceptual design. In brief, the treatment process design has been verified by using the activated sludge model No. 1 (ASM1) in GPS-X (v.7) simulation software. This application helps not only in sizing the treatment units but also in understanding the plant’s capacity. In the same time, it can assist in studying the future expansion works required for increased hydraulic and organic loadings. For this purpose, Tikrit WWTP was selected as a case study. The used model was validated by comparing the designed values of the plant and the modeling data. The verification of the obtained results from both hand calculations and the results of the program showed a good agreement. A significant difference in the volume of secondary treatment was obtained from design calculations, where the CAS without denitrification system was 9244 m3 (aerobic and secondary tanks), CAS with denitrification system was 11,324 m3 (anoxic, aerobic and secondary tanks) and for MBR system was 7468 m3 (anoxic, aerobic and immersed membrane tanks). From the obtained results point of view, it can be concluded that mathematical models can be considered as worthy tools to complement the established wastewater treatment plant design procedures.
机译:数学模型和仿真被认为是工程实践中的强大工具。这些工具正越来越多地用于改善废水处理厂的设计,因为概念设计非常复杂且定义不明确。在本文中,有三种选择:1)完全混合的活性污泥不脱氮(CAS); 2)混合除污的活性污泥(CAS-N)和; 3)膜生物反应器(MBR)工艺设计分为两个步骤:首先进行概念设计,以计算工艺单元的尺寸,然后进行建模和仿真,以提高概念设计的准确性。简而言之,已经通过使用GPS-X(v.7)模拟软件中的1号活性污泥模型(ASM1)验证了处理工艺设计。该应用程序不仅有助于确定处理单元的大小,而且有助于了解工厂的产能。同时,它可以帮助研究增加水力和有机物负荷所需的未来扩建工程。为此,选择了提克里特污水处理厂作为案例研究。通过比较工厂的设计值和建模数据来验证所使用的模型。从手工计算和程序结果中获得的结果的验证显示出良好的一致性。从设计计算中得出二级处理量的显着差异,其中不带反硝化系统的CAS为9244立方米(好氧和二级罐),带反硝化系统的CAS为11,324立方米(缺氧,好氧和二级罐)以及MBR系统是7468立方米(缺氧,好氧和浸没式膜罐)。从获得的结果来看,可以得出结论,数学模型可以被认为是补充已建立的废水处理厂设计程序的有价值的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号