首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Marine Science: Research & Development >Innovative Policy Options for Shared Marine Fishery Resource Management: Lessons from the Nigeria-sao Tome & Principe Joint Development Zone
【24h】

Innovative Policy Options for Shared Marine Fishery Resource Management: Lessons from the Nigeria-sao Tome & Principe Joint Development Zone

机译:共享海洋渔业资源管理的创新政策选择:尼日利亚圣多美和普林西比联合开发区的经验教训

获取原文
       

摘要

Offshore marine living and non-living resources straddling disputed areas of maritime boundary claims have been known to lead to the establishment of joint development zones by disputing states with a view to resolving such disputes in line with the provisions of Article 74(3) of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea III. Subsequently, the issue of straddling or highly migratory fish stocks led to the enactment of the 1995 United Nations Agreement for the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Stocks upon realization of the failure of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) III to address it. However, practical implementation of ‘The Agreement’ revealed a number of challenges that appeared to impede its success across various international regimes. These had detrimental consequences for the sustainable management of marine living resources. A new innovative approach is presented here for the resolution of the issues associated with migratory fishery stocks under a shared management arrangement. This arrangement is between Nigeria and Sao Tome & Principe based on an area of overlap observed during the delineation of their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). The area of overlap has been designated as a Joint Development Zone (JDZ) and placed under a management arrangement of a Joint Development Authority (JDA). It is proposed to legitimately encroach upon each of the two nations’ state EEZ such that potential issues of jurisdiction will be more effectively addressed. This will help strengthen the institutional relationships and cooperation between the two nations’ institutions in line with the principles and objectives of UNCLOS III and Chapter 17, Agenda 21 respectively. The approach is expected to prove useful to other similar management arrangements.
机译:众所周知,跨越海洋边界要求权争议区域的近海海洋生物资源和非生命资源导致争议州建立联合开发区,以期根据《联合国宪章》第74条第3款的规定解决此类争议。联合国海洋法公约III。随后,跨界或高度mi游鱼类种群的问题导致1995年《联合国养护和管理跨界鱼群和高度Mi游鱼类种群协定》的颁布,使《联合国海洋法公约》失效( 《联合国海洋法公约》第三版。但是,《协议》的实际执行揭示了许多挑战,似乎在各种国际制度中阻碍了其成功。这些对海洋生物资源的可持续管理产生不利影响。这里提出了一种新的创新方法,用于在共享管理安排下解决与游牧种群有关的问题。这种安排是在尼日利亚和圣多美与普林西比之间进行的,其依据是在划定其专属经济区(EEZ)时观察到的重叠区域。重叠区域已被指定为联合开发区(JDZ),并置于联合开发局(JDA)的管理安排之下。建议合理侵犯两国的国家专属经济区,以便可以更有效地解决潜在的管辖权问题。这将有助于加强两国机构之间的机构关系和合作,分别符合《第三次联合国海洋法公约》和《 21世纪议程》第十七章的原则和目标。预计该方法将对其他类似的管理安排有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号