首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >The Enforcement of Legal Administration in Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law
【24h】

The Enforcement of Legal Administration in Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law

机译:印度尼西亚刑法视野中的法律行政执法

获取原文
       

摘要

The aim of this research is to analytic why the criminal action of legal administration is easily committed by the governmental officials, describing the responsibility of legal administration in the perspective of Indonesian criminal law and analytics the model of legal administration enforcement based on the principal of Pancasila and the State of the Basic Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945 which is based on the progressive justice in Indonesia. This research is running with the socio-legal approach or normative and nomological (non-doctrinal) approach. Normatively, this research analytics the application of the State of the Basic Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945, the Indonesian Penal Code, Indonesian Criminal Justice System, any constitutions and the rules of Indonesian Regulations which is dealing with the legal criminal of administrations in Indonesia. Nomologically, this research analytics about the policy of governmental officials, the structure of social society in the enforcement of legal criminal administration in Indonesia of which pluralism society. The result of this research has shown-up: 1.Many of the governmental actions in running the governmental function has the contrarily of any legal principles, such as: equality before the law, equality before the justice, and the supreme legal principals which are living in Indonesian society, 2.The giving sanctions against the legal officials, the governmental officials who have broken the criminal legal administrations are not effectively, do not mirror the value justice in legal progressive of Indonesia. 3. The trial model of Indonesian legal administration is tendentiously positivistic of which type of politics determines law, most of the guilty and actions of the governmental officials in administrations belong to the negligence of the governmental officials by the argument on a negligence of the government officials in running the task of the government. The trial model of this criminal legal administration has been obviously does not mirror the value justice in the progressive law which has been based on the Principal of Pancasila and the State of the Basic Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
机译:这项研究的目的是分析为什么政府官员容易执行法律行政的犯罪行为,从印度尼西亚刑法的角度描述法律行政的责任,并分析基于潘卡西拉原理的法律行政执法模式1945年印度尼西亚共和国《基本宪法》以印度尼西亚的渐进正义为基础。这项研究以社会法律方法或规范和法理(非学说)方法进行。从规范上讲,本研究分析了1945年《印度尼西亚共和国基本宪法》,《印度尼西亚刑法》,《印度尼西亚刑事司法制度》,《印度尼西亚法规》中涉及印度尼西亚行政当局法定罪犯的所有宪法和规则的适用情况。从名词学上讲,本研究分析了印度尼西亚政府政府的政策,社会法律执行中的社会社会结构,其中包括多元社会。研究结果表明:1。许多政府行使政府职能的行为都与任何法律原则背道而驰,例如:法律面前平等,司法面前平等,最高法律原则是法律平等。 (2)对法律官员的制裁,破坏刑事法律行政管理的政府官员没有有效地反映在印度尼西亚法律进步中的价值正义。 3.印度尼西亚法律行政管理的审判模式倾向于实证主义,即哪种政治决定法律,政府中政府官员的大多数有罪和作为属于政府官员的过失,其理由是政府官员的过失。在执行政府的任务中。这种刑事法律行政的审判模式显然没有反映基于潘卡西拉校长和印度尼西亚共和国《基本宪法》的进步法中的价值正义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号