...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean medical science. >Healthcare Utilization and Treatment Patterns in Diabetic Macular Edema in Korea: a Retrospective Chart Review
【24h】

Healthcare Utilization and Treatment Patterns in Diabetic Macular Edema in Korea: a Retrospective Chart Review

机译:韩国糖尿病性黄斑水肿的医疗保健利用和治疗方式:回顾性图表审查。

获取原文

摘要

Background Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns for diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea. In this study, we investigated DME treatment patterns from 2009 to 2014 and the impact of baseline treatment on healthcare resource utilization and visual acuity (VA) outcomes. Methods A retrospective cohort chart review of DME patients treated at 11 hospital ophthalmology clinics between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013 was conducted. We collected data on demographics, healthcare resource utilization (clinic visits, treatment visits, and visits for ocular investigations), distribution of DME treatments, and VA. Results Overall, 522 DME patients (men, 55.2%; mean age, 59 years; mean HbA1c [n = 209], 8.4%) with 842 DME eyes were evaluated. For all treatments, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher during the first 6 months versus months 7–12, year 2, or year 3 ( P ≤ 0.001), but was highest for patients whose first treatment was an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment (visits/quarter; anti-VEGF, 1.9; corticosteroids, 1.7; laser, 1.4). Use of macular laser therapy decreased (44% to 8%), whereas use of anti-VEGF injections increased (44% to 69%) during the study period. However, VA improvement was not commensurate with healthcare resource utilization of anti-VEGF treatment (mean VA gain, 2.7 letters). Conclusion A trend toward increasing use of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for DME treatment was observed in Korea. However, the frequency of dosing and monitoring was lower in clinical practice versus major clinical trials, which may have led to the less-than-favorable improvements in visual outcomes.
机译:背景技术在韩国,有关糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的现实治疗模式的数据有限。在这项研究中,我们调查了2009年至2014年的DME治疗模式以及基线治疗对医疗资源利用和视敏度(VA)结果的影响。方法对2012年1月1日至2013年12月31日在11家医院眼科门诊就诊的DME患者进行回顾性队列研究。我们收集了以下方面的数据:人口统计数据,医疗保健资源利用(诊所就诊,治疗就诊以及进行眼科检查的就诊),DME治疗的分布以及VA。结果总体上,对842只DME眼的522例DME患者(男性,占55.2%;平均年龄,59岁;平均HbA1c [n = 209],占8.4%)进行了评估。对于所有治疗,在最初的6个月中,医疗资源的利用率显着高于7-12个月,第2年或第3年(P≤0.001),但对于第一种治疗是抗血管内皮生长因子的患者,其利用率最高( VEGF)治疗(访问/季度;抗VEGF,1.9;皮质类固醇,1.7;激光,1.4)。在研究期间,黄斑激光治疗的使用减少了(44%至8%),而抗VEGF注射的使用增加了(44%至69%)。然而,VA的改善与抗VEGF治疗的医疗资源利用不相称(平均VA增加,2.7个字母)。结论在韩国观察到玻璃体内抗VEGF注射剂用于DME治疗的趋势有所增加。但是,与主要的临床试验相比,在临床实践中给药和监测的频率较低,这可能导致视觉效果的改善程度较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号