...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology >Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue to coronally advanced flap alone in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A clinical study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue to coronally advanced flap alone in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A clinical study

机译:脱细胞真皮基质同种异体移植物和上皮下结缔组织对单独冠状动脉晚期皮瓣治疗多发性牙龈退缩的效果的比较评价:临床研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:Obtaining predictable and esthetic root coverage has become an important part of periodontal therapy. Several techniques have been developed to achieve these goals with variable outcomes. The aim of this study was to appraise the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) compared to coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.Materials and Methods:A total of 30 patients aged between 18 and 50 years, with multiple Miller's Class I and II recessions on labial or buccal surfaces of teeth were selected for this study. The patients were randomly assigned to CAF + ADMA, CAF + SCTG and CAF groups with 10 patients in each group. The clinical parameters assessed were probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), width of keratinized tissue, plaque index and papilla bleeding index at base line and 6 months after surgery.Results:Statistical analysis using One-way ANOVA suggested that the root coverage obtained was greater in the ADMA + CAF (89.83 ± 15.29%), when compared to SCTG + CAF (87.73 ± 17.63%) and CAF (63.77 ± 27.12%) groups. The predictability for coverage of >90% was greater in CAF + ADMA (65%) when compared with SCTG + CAF (61.66%) and CAF (31.17%). Improvements in the clinical parameters from baseline were found in all the three groups treated.Conclusion:It was concluded that all three techniques could provide root coverage in Miller's class I and II gingival recessions; but greater % root coverage and predictability for coverage of >90% could be expected with CAF + ADMA and CAF + SCTG groups when compared with CAF alone.
机译:背景:获得可预测且美观的牙根覆盖已成为牙周治疗的重要组成部分。已经开发出多种技术来实现这些目标并产生不同的结果。这项研究的目的是评估脱细胞真皮基质同种异体移植物(ADMA)和上皮下结缔组织移植物(SCTG)与冠状动脉晚期皮瓣(CAF)相比在多发性牙龈退缩中的疗效。材料和方法:总共30本研究选择了年龄在18至50岁之间,在牙齿的唇面或颊面有多个米勒I级和II级凹痕的患者。将患者随机分为CAF + ADMA,CAF + SCTG和CAF组,每组10名患者。评估的临床参数包括探查袋底深度(PPD),临床附着水平(CAL),牙龈退缩(GR),角化组织宽度,基线和术后6个月的斑块指数和乳头出血指数。单向方差分析表明,与SCTG + CAF(87.73±17.63%)和CAF(63.77±27.12%)组相比,ADMA + CAF所获得的根系覆盖率更高(89.83±15.29%)。与SCTG + CAF(61.66%)和CAF(31.17%)相比,CAF + ADMA(65%)对覆盖率的可预测性更高(65%)。在治疗的所有三个组中,临床参数均较基线水平有所改善。结论:得出的结论是,所有三种技术均可以在Miller的I类和II类牙龈凹陷中提供牙根覆盖;但是与单独的CAF相比,CAF + ADMA和CAF + SCTG组的根覆盖率更高,覆盖率可预测性> 90%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号