首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian association of pediatric surgeons >A comparison of laparoscopic redo fundoplications for failed toupet and nissen fundoplications in children
【24h】

A comparison of laparoscopic redo fundoplications for failed toupet and nissen fundoplications in children

机译:腹腔镜重做胃底折叠术对儿童足趾失败和尼森胃底折叠术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: We compared laparoscopic redo fundoplications performed for failed laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) and failed laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications (LNFs). Methods: Redo LTF (R-LTF; n = 4) and redo LNF (R-LNF; n = 6) performed between 2007 and 2014 were assessed retrospectively for severity of intraperitoneal adhesions on a scale of 0–3, identification/preservation of the anterior/posterior/hepatic branches of the vagus nerve (VN), complications, and outcome. Results: Redos were performed after a mean of 34 months in R-LTF and 32 months in R-LNF (P = ns) indicated for sliding hernia (n = 3; 2 with partial wrap dehiscence) and partial wrap dehiscence (n = 1) in R-LTF and sliding hernia (n = 6; 4 with partial wrap dehiscence) in R-LNF. The mean adhesion severity score was 1.5 in R-LTF and 2.5 in R-LNF (P 0.05). The mean number of VN branches identified/preserved was 2.0 in R-LTF and 0.8 in R-LNF (P 0.05). Mean operative times and mean blood loss were similar. Intraoperative complications were accidental local trauma (n = 1 in R-LTF and n = 3 in R-LNF, one requiring conversion to open repair) (P = ns). Gastric outlet obstruction developed in two R-LNF cases; both were managed conservatively. There have been no further recurrences to date. Conclusion: Although our series is small, adhesions were less, and identification/preservation of VN was easier during R-LTF.
机译:目的:我们比较了失败的腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术(LTF)和失败的腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术(LNFs)的腹腔镜重做胃底折叠术。方法:回顾性评估2007年至2014年之间进行的重做LTF(R-LTF; n = 4)和重做LNF(R-LNF; n = 6),评估腹膜内粘连的严重性,等级为0-3,鉴定/保存。迷走神经(VN)的前/后/肝分支,并发症和结局。结果:R-LTF平均术后34个月,R-LNF平均32个月(P = ns)后进行重做,显示滑动疝(n = 3;部分包裂开裂2例)和部分包膜裂开(n = 1) )在R-LTF中发生)和滑动疝(n = 6;在部分包裹性裂开的情况下发生4)。 R-LTF的平均粘连严重程度评分为1.5,R-LNF的平均粘附程度评分为2.5(P <0.05)。在R-LTF中识别/保留的VN分支的平均数为2.0,在R-LNF中为0.8(P <0.05)。平均手术时间和平均失血量相似。术中并发症为意外的局部创伤(R-LTF中n = 1,R-LNF中n = 3,其中一个需要转换为开放性修复)(P = ns)。 2例R-LNF患者出现胃出口梗阻;两者都是保守的。迄今为止,没有进一步的重复发生。结论:尽管我们的系列很小,但在R-LTF期间粘连较少,并且VN的识别/保存更容易。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号