首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intensive Care >Comparison of total, salivary and calculated free cortisol levels in patients with severe sepsis
【24h】

Comparison of total, salivary and calculated free cortisol levels in patients with severe sepsis

机译:严重脓毒症患者总皮质醇,唾液皮质醇和游离皮质醇水平的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe purposes of the study were to compare serum total cortisol (STC), salivary cortisol (SaC) and calculated free cortisol (cFC) levels at baseline and after the adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test in patients with severe sepsis (SS) and determine the suitability of use of SaC and cFC levels instead of STC for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) in patients with SS. And secondary aims of this study were to compare these parameters in patients with SS with healthy controls and check their effects on survival status of the patients. MethodsThirty patients with SS (15 men and 15 women) were compared with 16 healthy controls. Low-dose (1?μg) ACTH stimulation test was performed to the patients on the first, seventh and 28th days of diagnosis of SS, but in control group, 1?μg ACTH stimulation test was performed only once. STC, SaC and cFC levels were measured during ACTH stimulation test. ResultsPatients were categorized as having low or high baseline STC according to a cut-off level of 10?μg/dL. In high STC group, baseline and peak SaC levels were found to be 2.3 (0.2–9.0) and 3.4 (0.5–17.8) μg/dL on D1 and 1.1 (0.8–4.6) and 2.6 (1.3–2.9) μg/dL on D7, respectively. In the control group, baseline and peak SaC levels were 0.4 (0.1–1.4) and 1.1 (0.4–2.5) μg/dL, respectively. Baseline and peak SaC levels after ACTH stimulation were found to be higher in high STC group than in controls, but they were found to be similar in low STC and control groups. In high STC group, cFC levels were 0.3 (0.1–0.3) and 0.4 (0.3–0.7) μg/dL on D1 and 0.2 (0.1–0.3) and 0.4 (0.1–0.7) μg/dL on D7, respectively. In the control group, baseline and peak cFC levels were 1.7 (0.4–1.9) and 1.8 (1.0–6.6) μg/dL, respectively. cFC levels were found to be lower in patients with SS subgroups than in the control group. Baseline and stimulated STC, SaC and cFC levels did not differ according to the survival status. SaC, cFC and STC levels were found to be correlated with each other. ConclusionsSS is associated with increased SaC, but decreased cFC levels when baseline STC is assumed to be sufficient. When STC level is assumed to be insufficient, SaC levels remain unchanged, but cFC levels are decreased. Lower STC levels is not associated with increased mortality in patients with SS. More data are needed in order to suggest the use of SaC and cFC instead of STC. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT02589431
机译:背景研究的目的是比较基线期和重症败血症(SS)患者肾上腺皮质营养激素(ACTH)刺激试验后的血清总皮质醇(STC),唾液皮质醇(SaC)和计算的游离皮质醇(cFC)水平并确定使用SaC和cFC水平代替STC来诊断SS患者的肾上腺功能不全(AI)是否合适。本研究的次要目的是比较SS患者和健康对照者的这些参数,并检查其对患者生存状态的影响。方法将30例SS患者(男15例,女15例)与16例健康对照者进行比较。在SS诊断的第一天,第七天和第二十八天,对患者进行了低剂量(1?μg)ACTH刺激试验,但在对照组中,仅进行了一次1μgACTH刺激试验。在ACTH刺激测试期间测量STC,SaC和cFC水平。结果根据10?μg/ dL的临界水平将患者分为基线STC较低或较高。在高STC组中,发现D1的基线和峰值SaC水平分别为2.3(0.2-9.0)和3.4(0.5-17.8)μg/ dL,D1时为1.1(0.8-4.6)和2.6(1.3-2.9)μg/ dL。 D7分别。在对照组中,基线和峰值SaC水平分别为0.4(0.1-1.4)和1.1(0.4-2.5)μg/ dL。在高STC组中,ACTH刺激后的基线和峰值SaC水平高于对照组,但在低STC组和对照组中相似。在高STC组中,D1的cFC水平分别为0.3(0.1-0.3)和0.4(0.3-0.7)μg/ dL,D7分别为0.2(0.1-0.3)和0.4(0.1-0.7)μg/ dL。在对照组中,基线和峰值cFC水平分别为1.7(0.4–1.9)和1.8(1.0–6.6)μg/ dL。发现SS亚组患者的cFC水平低于对照组。基线和刺激的STC,SaC和cFC水平没有根据生存状况而有所不同。发现SaC,cFC和STC的水平相互关联。结论SS与SaC升高有关,但当假定基线STC足够时,cFC水平降低。当假定STC含量不足时,SaC含量保持不变,但cFC含量降低。较低的STC水平与SS患者的死亡率增加无关。为了建议使用SaC和cFC代替STC,需要更多数据。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT02589431

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号