首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Administration >Survey on academic medicine culture, enablers & barriers in a newly formed academic department in Singapore
【24h】

Survey on academic medicine culture, enablers & barriers in a newly formed academic department in Singapore

机译:在新加坡新成立的学术系中对学术医学文化,促成因素和障碍进行调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: A positive culture of academic medicine is important for improving healthcare, research and medical education. This study seeks to assess academic medicine culture, enablers and barriers with a multi-dimensional structured survey, in a newly formed academic department from the perspectives of faculty and staff.Methods: Thirteen dimensions relating to academic medicine culture were identified after focused group discussions. Each dimension contains four relevant questions with answers on a 5-point Likert scale. This web-based questionnaire survey was conducted for senior and junior physicians within SingHealth Duke-NUS Obstetrics & Gynecology (OBGYN) academic department in 2011. This unit was started within the academic medical centre formed by SingHealth, and Duke-NUS which is a medical school jointly established by Duke University and National University of Singapore (NUS). Gaps were identified and addressed with various initiatives. A second survey in 2012 and a third survey in 2013 were conducted to assess the change in culture.Results: In the first survey, the top three favorable dimensions (highest percentage of composite positive response) were: Supervisor and Departmental Support for Academic Medicine (64.0%); Academic Faculty Development (57.9%); and Communications & Feedbacks on Academic Medicine (57.3%). The bottom three dimensions which were areas for improvements were: Academic Clinical Staffing Issue (23.8%); Relating Clinical Service to Research & Education (33.2%); and Academic Teamwork across Institutions (36.3%). In the second survey, there was overall improvement for 12 of the 13 dimensions. In the third survey, there was overall improvement for all the 13 dimensions compared to the first survey.Conclusions: There were positive changes, likely contributed by initiatives within the department to engage staff and to address gaps in various aspects of academic medicine culture.
机译:目的:积极的学术医学文化对改善医疗保健,研究和医学教育至关重要。本研究旨在从教职员工的角度,在一个新成立的学术部门中,通过多维结构化调查来评估学术医学文化,促成因素和障碍。方法:经过小组讨论后,确定了与学术医学文化有关的13个方面。每个维度包含四个相关问题,并在5点李克特量表上给出答案。这项基于网络的问卷调查于2011年为SingHealth杜克大学-国大妇产科(OBGYN)学术部门的高级和初级医师进行。该部门是在SingHealth和Duke-NUS组成的学术医学中心内启动的。由杜克大学和新加坡国立大学(NUS)共同建立的学校。找出差距并通过各种举措解决。 2012年进行了第二次调查,2013年进行了第三次调查,以评估文化的变化。结果:在第一项调查中,前三个有利方面(复合阳性反应的最高百分比)是:主管和部门对学术医学的支持( 64.0%);学术发展(57.9%);以及学术医学的交流和反馈(57.3%)。最下面三个需要改进的方面是:学术临床人员配备问题(23.8%);与研究和教育相关的临床服务(33.2%);和跨机构的学术团队合作(36.3%)。在第二次调查中,这13个维度中的12个有了整体改善。在第三次调查中,与第一次调查相比,所有13个方面都得到了总体改善。结论:出现了积极的变化,可能是由部门内部的举措引起的,以吸引员工和解决学术医学文化各个方面的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号