...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand and microsurgery >A Comparison of the Reliability of Make Versus Break Testing in Measuring Palmar Abduction Strength of the Thumb
【24h】

A Comparison of the Reliability of Make Versus Break Testing in Measuring Palmar Abduction Strength of the Thumb

机译:比较拇指测试法测量手掌外展强度的可靠性与断裂测试的可靠性比较

获取原文

摘要

Previous studies have established the role of quantitative measurements of palmar abduction strength of the thumb (PAST). This study compares the reliability of the ‘make’ versus the ‘break’ test in measuring PAST in healthy volunteers. In a ‘make’ test, the body part being tested is positioned at the start of its range of motion and the participant is asked to exert his/her maximal force. In a ‘break’ test, increasing force is applied to a body part after it has completed its range of motion, until the joint being tested gives way. PAST was measured in both hands in 100 healthy volunteers using a handheld device. Two examiners measured PAST using both the ‘make’ and ‘break’ test to determine inter-rater reliability. The tests were repeated in 30 volunteers 6 weeks after the initial testing to determine intra-rater reliability. Our results showed that the ‘make’ test has better inter and intra-rater reliability.
机译:先前的研究已经确立了定量测量拇指手掌外展强度(PAST)的作用。这项研究比较了在健康志愿者中测量PAST的“制造”测试与“断裂”测试的可靠性。在“制作”测试中,被测试的身体部位位于其运动范围的起点,并且要求参与者施加他/她的最大力量。在“断裂”测试中,在完成运动范围之后,将逐渐增加的力施加到身体部位,直到被测试的关节让步。使用手持设备在100名健康志愿者中用双手测量PAST。两名审查员使用“ make”和“ break”测试来测量PAST,以确定评估者之间的可靠性。初始测试后6周,在30名志愿者中重复进行测试,以确定评分者内部信度。我们的结果表明,“ make”测试具有更好的内部和内部评估者可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号