首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis >Abnormal accounting accruals Management by market disciplinary approach: Evidence in Tunisian banks before and after the Arab Revolution
【24h】

Abnormal accounting accruals Management by market disciplinary approach: Evidence in Tunisian banks before and after the Arab Revolution

机译:异常的会计应计制市场纪律管理:阿拉伯革命前后突尼斯银行的证据

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper tests the effect of governance factor related to theshareholder ownership and to the auditor’s characteristic on the abnormalaccounting accruals in Tunisian banks. The aim of this study is to estimate theabnormal accruals drawing on the classical Kothari et al (2005) [13] model todemonstrate their progress before and after Tunisian revolution. Indeed,through the difference-in-difference approach, “DID,” this paper attempts todeduct the disciplinary factors that contribute to follow up these accrualsusing a linear regression model. The results show that the accountingmanipulation and net income smoothing in Tunisian banks worsened after theTunisian revolution, contrary to what was expected. This aggravation is shownby the "DID" approach that was the result of the market disciplinedeterioration played by the majority of shareholders, the external auditors andthe supervisory board. The overrun shareholders ownership in Tunisian bankshave caused an interest collision between them and the managers. The latter inturn, made collisions with the external auditors through rewards for a longperiod.
机译:本文测试了与股东所有权和审计师特征有关的治理因素对突尼斯银行异常会计应计项目的影响。本研究的目的是根据经典的Kothari等人(2005)[13]模型估计异常应计项目,以证明突尼斯革命前后革命的进展。的确,本文通过差异差异方法“ DID”,尝试使用线性回归模型来推断有助于跟踪这些应计项目的学科因素。结果表明,突尼斯革命后突尼斯银行的会计操纵和净收入趋于恶化,这与预期相反。大多数股东,外部审计师和监事会所扮演的市场纪律恶化的结果是“ DID”方法的出现,加剧了这种情况。突尼斯银行股东的超支所有权已导致他们与管理人之间发生利益冲突。后者反过来通过长期的奖励与外部审计师发生冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号