...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences >A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis
【24h】

A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis

机译:咬痕分析中覆盖层生成方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Aim:To evaluate the best method of overlay generation out of the three methods, i.e., manual, photocopying, and computer assisted method.Materials and Methods:Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches of 25 individuals participating in the study were made and dental study models were prepared. Overlay production was done by manual, photocopying, and computer assisted methods. Finally, the overlays obtained by each method were compared.Results:Kruskal Wallis ANOVA H test was used for the comparison of manual, photocopying, and computer assisted overlay generation methods. H value being highest in case of computer assisted overlays, thus, making it the best method of overlay generation out of the three methods.Conclusion:We conclude that the method of computer assisted overlay generation is the best among the three methods used in our study.
机译:目的:评价手动,影印和计算机辅助三种方法中最佳的覆盖物生成方法。材料与方法:对25名参与研究的个体的上颌和下颌弓进行印象,并建立牙科研究模型准备了。覆盖生产是通过手动,影印和计算机辅助方法完成的。结果:Kruskal Wallis ANOVA H检验用于比较手动,影印和计算机辅助的叠印生成方法。在计算机辅助覆盖的情况下,H值最高,因此使其成为三种方法中最好的覆盖生成方法。结论:我们得出结论,计算机辅助覆盖生成方法在本研究使用的三种方法中是最好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号