首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology >A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis
【24h】

A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis

机译:咬痕分析中三种常用的二维叠加生成方法的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The present study attempts to compare the bite mark overlays generated by three different methods. The objectives of the study were to compare the three commonly used techniques for overlay generation and to evaluate the interobserver reliability in assessing bite marks by these methods. Materials and Methods: Overlays were produced from the biting surfaces of six upper and six lower anterior teeth of 30 dental study models using the following three methods: (a) Hand tracing from wax impressions, (b) radiopaque impression method and (c) computer-based method. Results: The computer-based method was found to be the most accurate method. Of the two hand tracing methods, radiopaque wax impression method was better than the wax impression method for overlay generation. Conclusions: It is recommended that forensic odontologists use computerized method, but the use of hand tracing overlays in bite mark comparison cases using radiopaque wax impression method can also be done where sophisticated software and trained persons in forensic odontology are not available.
机译:目的:本研究试图比较三种不同方法产生的咬痕覆盖物。该研究的目的是比较三种常用的叠加生成技术,并评估观察者之间通过这些方法评估咬痕的可靠性。材料和方法:使用以下三种方法,从30个牙科研究模型的六颗上,下六颗前牙的咬合面产生覆盖物:(a)从蜡印中进行手描,(b)不透射线的印法和(c)计算机基于方法。结果:发现基于计算机的方法是最准确的方法。在这两种手部描画方法中,不透射线的蜡印方法要优于蜡印方法以生成覆盖物。结论:建议法医齿科医师使用计算机化方法,但是在不具备复杂的软件和法医齿科医师培训的情况下,在使用不透射线蜡模压法进行咬痕比较的情况下,也可以使用手描图覆盖物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号