...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : >Traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of hepatocellular cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Traditional Chinese medicines in the treatment of hepatocellular cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:中药治疗肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background Liver cancer is a common malignancy with a high mortality rate. Given the poor prognosis associated with this cancer, many patients seek additional therapies that may improve quality of life or survival. Several Traditional Chinese Medicines (TCM) have been evaluated in clinical trials, but little is known about them outside of China. Methods We searched independently and in duplicate 8 electronic databases, including 2 Chinese language databases, until February 2009. We included any randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating a TCM oral preparation for the treatment of hepatocellular cancers. We abstracted data on survival, tumor response, and performance scores. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis and applied a meta-regression analysis. Results We included 45 RCTs (n = 3,236). All studies employed an active control group. In general, the reporting of methodological issues was poor. We analyzed data from 37 trials reporting on complete response effects score (Relative Risk [RR] of 1.26 (95 CI, 1.04–1.52, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%, P = 0.99). Products containing ginseng, astragalus and mylabris had a larger treatment effect (OR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.04–1.71, P = 0.01) than the pooled broad estimate, also the case for astragalus-based treatments (OR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.001–1.80. P = 0.048). We examined survival rates and pooled 15 studies reporting on 6 month outcomes (RR 1.10, 95% CI, 1.04–1.15, P = 2 = 0%, P = 0.60). This effect was consistent at other prospective dates, including 12 months (22 trials, RR 1.26, 95% CI, 1.17–1.36, P = 2 = 7%, P = 0.36), 24 months (15 trials, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.40–2.03, P = 2 = 0%, P = 0.75); and, at 36 months (8 trials, RR 2.40, 95% CI, 1.65–3.49, P = 2 = 0%, P = 0.62). Limitations All included trials were conducted in China where emerging evidence suggests many RCTs are not, in fact, randomized. Publication bias may exist, favouring positive reports. Conclusion Our meta-analysis displays compelling evidence of effectiveness for hepatocellular cancers that should be evaluated in high-quality and transparent clinical trials.
机译:背景技术肝癌是常见的恶性肿瘤,死亡率高。鉴于与这种癌症相关的预后较差,许多患者寻求其他可以改善生活质量或生存率的疗法。已经在临床试验中评估了几种传统中药(TCM),但在中国以外对其知之甚少。方法截至2009年2月,我们独立搜索了8个电子数据库,包括2个中文数据库,其中包括两个电子数据库。我们纳入了所有随机对照临床试验(RCT),以评估中药口服制剂对肝细胞癌的治疗作用。我们提取了有关存活率,肿瘤反应和性能评分的数据。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并应用了荟萃回归分析。结果我们纳入了45个RCT(n = 3,236)。所有研究均采用了活跃对照组。总体而言,方法学问题的报告不多。我们分析了37个试验的数据,这些试验报告了完整的反应效果评分(相对风险[RR]为1.26(95 CI,1.04–1.52,P = 0.01,I 2 = 0%,P = 0.99)。包含人参,黄芪和Mylabris的产品的治疗效果(OR 1.34、95%CI,1.04–1.71,P = 0.01)比汇总的广泛估计值更大,基于黄芪的治疗(OR 1.35、95%CI, 1.001–1.80。P = 0.048)我们检查了生存率,并汇总了15项报告6个月结局的研究(RR 1.10、95%CI,1.04–1.15,P = 2 = 0%,P = 0.60)。在其他预期日期,包括12个月(22个试验,RR 1.26、95%CI,1.17-1.36,P = 2 = 7%,P = 0.36),24个月(15个试验,1.72),这种作用是一致的,95%CI,1.40–2.03,P = 2 = 0%,P = 0.75);并且,在36个月时(8个试验,RR 2.40,95%CI,1.65–3.49,P = 2 = 0%,P = 0.62)。限制所有纳入的试验均在中国进行,新证据表明许多RCT实际上并非随机存在。存在,有利于正面报告。结论我们的荟萃分析显示了令人信服的肝癌有效性证据,应在高质量和透明的临床试验中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号