首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Promoting Affirmative Action in Higher Education: A Case Study of the University for Development Studies Bridging Programme
【24h】

Promoting Affirmative Action in Higher Education: A Case Study of the University for Development Studies Bridging Programme

机译:促进高等教育中的平等权利行动:以发展大学研究衔接计划为例

获取原文
       

摘要

Despite various campaigns for gender equity through affirmative action programmes, there still remains the challenge of bridging the gender gap in education, especially at the tertiary level. In view of the idea that mainstream literature has much to offer on advocacy issues on affirmative action for gender equity in education rather than reports on progress, this paper contributes to filing this gap by presenting a descriptive coverage of practical application of the concept of affirmative action by a case study report on the University for Development Studies’ Bridging Programme for girls. Methodologically, this paper is an outcome of both descriptive and applied research methods, in the sense that it describes the implementation process of the gender gap bridging programme for university admissions through a female centered approach by the University for Development Studies, by adopting existing research methodological procedures such as interview and review of secondary data. The findings were also presented using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The major findings indicate that before the implementation of the affirmative action measures in the university, there was a very wide gap between the male and female student populations in favour of males, but after the bridging programme, there was a reduction in the gender gap. It was also observed that though female beneficiaries came in with weak academic backgrounds; usually from poorer households and/or deprived rural areas, they competed favorably with those who were admitted with the normal admission requirements once mainstreamed into the system. The paper concludes that affirmative action is an important tool for bridging the gender gap in education, and recommended that the local government should support affirmative action programmes such as that of the University for Development Studies by sponsoring needy female students to benefit from the programme.
机译:尽管通过平等权利行动方案开展了各种争取性别平等的运动,但仍然存在弥合教育中性别差距的挑战,特别是在高等教育方面。鉴于主流文学在教育中促进性别平等的平权行动而不是进度报告方面可以提供很多提倡的观点,本文通过描述性地描述平权行动概念的实际应用,为弥补这一差距做出了贡献。一份关于发展研究大学女童衔接计划的案例研究报告。从方法上说,本文是描述性研究方法和应用研究方法的结果,在某种意义上,它通过采用现有研究方法,通过发展研究大学通过以女性为中心的方法,描述了大学录取的性别差距缩小计划的实施过程。诸如采访和审查二级数据的程序。还使用定性和定量方法介绍了发现结果。主要发现表明,在大学实施平权行动措施之前,男女学生之间的差距非常大,以男性为好,但是在过渡方案实施之后,性别差距有所减少。还观察到,尽管女性受益者的学业背景薄弱;他们通常来自较贫困的家庭和/或贫困的农村地区,因此与那些被纳入主流系统并具有正常录取要求的录取者竞争良好。本文的结论是,平权行动是弥合教育中性别差距的重要工具,并建议地方政府应通过资助有需要的女学生从该计划中受益,来支持平权行动计划,如发展研究大学的计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号