首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Lawn Ball: Comparative Perspective of India & Malaysia
【24h】

Lawn Ball: Comparative Perspective of India & Malaysia

机译:草坪球:印度和马来西亚的比较视角

获取原文
       

摘要

A comparative study was conducted on international players of lawn bowl. The study was conducted on 22 players who volunteered from India and Malaysia (11 players from each country). The Questionnaire contained 35 questions under categories of facilities, coaches, benefits, selection, performance, promotion and publicity of the game (reliability 0 .89 & Validity .82). Percentage of responses was calculated. For facilities Malaysians had an opinion that on an average 85.5 % Malaysia had the players, coaches, equipments, play facilities, coaches and a maximum utilization of the facilities and Indians had an opinion that on an average 16.35% India had the facilities. On the factor of coaches' quality the Malaysians had an absolute opinion 100% and were extremely positive of the role, knowledge, efficiency, punctuality, helping nature for players. On the factor of coaches' quality the Indians 53.57% and were of the positive whereas 46.43% players were having a negative opinion about the coaches' quality and their role played at various levels. On the factor of benefits to the players monetary (state level), off season camps, duration of camps, national government support, honour & motivation, continuous competitions etc the Malaysians 85.65 % supported the opinion whereas 14.35% were found to be apprehensive of the benefits. On the factor of benefits to the players monetary etc 69.88% Indians supported the opinion whereas 30.12 % were found to be apprehensive of the benefits. On the factor of selection of the team regarding regional preferences and background the 51.57% Malaysians were in agreement to the procedures however 41.43% were not in agreement. On the factor of selection of the team regarding regional preferences and background the 85.04 % Indians were in agreement to the procedures however 15.06% were not in agreement. On the factor of performance of the team regarding commitment to performance, psychological preparedness & professionalism 96.96 % Malaysian players had agreement for it however 3.03% were not in agreement. On the factor of performance of the team 79.98 % Indian players had agreement for it however 12.4 were not in agreement. Promotion & Publicity factor had 85.44% Malaysian players agreeing whereas 14.56 % not in agreement whereas 79.98% Indian players agreeing whereas 20.02 % not in agreement.
机译:对国际草地碗选手进行了比较研究。该研究是针对来自印度和马来西亚的22名运动员(每个国家的11名运动员)进行的。该调查问卷包含35个问题,涉及设施,教练,福利,选择,表现,促销和宣传等类别(可靠性0 .89和效度.82)。计算响应的百分比。对于设施,马来西亚人认为平均有85.5%的马来西亚拥有运动员,教练,装备,比赛设施,教练和设施的最大利用率,而印度人则认为平均有16.35%的印度拥有设施。关于教练的素质,马来西亚人有100%的绝对意见,并且对角色,知识,效率,守时,对球员的帮助性质都非常满意。在教练素质的因素上,印第安人占53.57%,是积极的,而46.43%的球员对教练的素质及其在各个级别上的作用持负面看法。在给球员带来金钱利益(州级),淡季训练营,训练营持续时间,国家政府支持,荣誉和动力,持续比赛等方面,马来西亚人85.65%支持该观点,而14.35%的人则对此表示担忧。好处。在给玩家带来收益的因素上,货币等占69.88%,印度人支持该观点,而30.12%的人对收益感到忧虑。在团队选择方面,区域偏好和背景因素使51.57%的马来西亚人同意该程序,但41.43%的人不同意。在选择团队时要考虑区域偏好和背景因素,其中85.04%的印度人同意该程序,但15.06%的人不同意。关于团队对绩效承诺,心理准备和专业水平的表现因素,有96.96%的马来西亚球员对此表示同意,但3.03%的参与者不同意。在球队表现方面,有79.98%的印度球员同意这一点,但是12.4没有同意。晋升和宣传因素有85.44%的马来西亚玩家表示同意,而14.56%的表示不同意,而79.98%的印度玩家表示同意,而20.02%的表示不同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号