首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Grading Practice as Valid Measures of Academic Achievement of Secondary Schools Students for National Development
【24h】

Grading Practice as Valid Measures of Academic Achievement of Secondary Schools Students for National Development

机译:评分实践是中学生民族发展学业成就的有效手段

获取原文
       

摘要

Assigning grades is probably the most important measurement decision that classroom teachers makes. When teachers are provided with some measurement instruction, they still use subjective value judgments when assigning grades to students. This paper therefore, examines the grading practice as valid measures of academic achievement in secondary schools student for national development. Three hundred teachers (300) were sampled by means of stratified random sampling techniques from the three senatorial districts in Delta State. A validated questionnaire was used for data collection. Mean and standard deviation was used to answer the research questions while t-test statistic was used to test the stated hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The results of the study revealed that there was no significant difference between male and female teachers grading of students in secondary schools; there was significant difference between urban and rural teachers assigning of grades to students work accurately in secondary schools in Delta State. Keywords; Grading and Assessment
机译:分配分数可能是课堂老师做出的最重要的测量决策。当向教师提供一些测量指导时,他们在为学生分配分数时仍会使用主观价值判断。因此,本文探讨了分级实践,作为中学生为国家发展而进行的学术成就的有效衡量标准。通过分层随机抽样技术,从三角州的三个参议院地区抽取了300名教师(300名)。经过验证的问卷用于数据收集。均值和标准差用于回答研究问题,而t检验统计量则用于在0.05的显着性水平下检验所述假设。研究结果表明,中学学生的男女教师等级之间没有显着差异。在三角州的中学,城乡教师为学生准确分配成绩的成绩之间存在显着差异。关键字;评分与评估

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号