首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dentistry >A Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt- Chromium Copings Fabricated by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/ Milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron)
【24h】

A Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt- Chromium Copings Fabricated by Two Different CAD/CAM Systems (CAD/ Milling, CAD/ Ceramill Sintron)

机译:两种不同的CAD / CAM系统(CAD /铣削,CAD / Ceramill Sintron)制造的钴铬涂层边缘和内部配合的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Statement of the Problem: Marginal fitness is the most important criteria for evaluation of the clinical acceptability of a cast restoration. Marginal gap which is due to cement solubility and plaque retention is potentially detrimental to both tooth and periodontal tissues. Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of cobalt- chromium (Co-Cr) copings fabricated by two different CAD/CAM systems: (CAD/ milling and CAD/ Ceramill Sintron). Materials and Method: We prepared one machined standard stainless steel master model with following dimensions: 7 mm height, 5mm diameter, 90? shoulder marginal finish line with 1 mm width, 10? convergence angle and anti-rotational surface on the buccal aspect of the die. There were 10 copings produced from hard presintered Co-Cr blocks according to CAD/ Milling technique and ten copings from soft non- presintered Co-Cr blocks according to CAD/ Ceramill Sintron technique. Marginal and internal accuracies of copings were documented by the replica technique. Replicas were examined at ten reference points under a digital microscope (230X). The Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. p & 0.001 was considered significant. Results: Statistically significant differences existed between the groups ( p & 0.001). The CAD/milling group (hard copings) had a mean marginal discrepancy (MD) of 104 μm, axial discrepancy (AD) of 23 μm and occlusal discrepancy of 130 μm. For CAD/ Ceramill Sintron group, these values were 195 μm (MD), 46 μm (AD), and 232 μm (OD). Internal total discrepancy (ITD) for the CAD/milling group was 77 μm, whereas for the CAD/Ceramill Sintron group was 143 μm. Conclusion: Hard presintered Co-Cr copings had significantly higher marginal and internal accuracies compared to the soft non-presintered copings. Keywords ● Marginal and Internal fit? ● CAD/CAM? ● Ceramill Sintron? ● Base Metal Alloy ?
机译:问题陈述:边缘适应度是评估铸件修复体临床可接受性的最重要标准。由于骨水泥溶解度和牙菌斑保留而导致的边缘间隙可能对牙齿和牙周组织均有害。目的:这项体外研究旨在评估由两种不同的CAD / CAM系统(CAD /铣削和CAD / Ceramill Sintron)制造的钴铬(Co-Cr)顶盖的边缘和内部配合。材料和方法:我们准备了一种机械加工的标准不锈钢主模型,其尺寸如下:高度7毫米,直径5毫米,90? 1毫米宽的肩部边缘终点线10?模具颊侧的会聚角和防旋转表面。根据CAD /铣削技术,从硬预烧结的Co-Cr块产生10个顶盖,根据CAD / Ceramill Sintron技术从软的未烧结的Co-Cr块产生10个顶盖。复制技术记录了应对的边际和内部准确性。在数字显微镜(230X)下于十个参考点检查复制品。学生t检验用于统计分析。 p < 0.001被认为是显着的。结果:各组之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p <0.001)。 CAD /铣削组(硬顶)的平均边缘差异(MD)为104μm,轴向差异(AD)为23μm,咬合差异为130μm。对于CAD / Ceramill Sintron组,这些值为19​​5μm(MD),46μm(AD)和232μm(OD)。 CAD /铣削组的内部总差异(ITD)为77μm,而CAD / Ceramill Sintron组的内部总差异为143μm。结论:硬质预烧结Co-Cr涂层与软质未预烧结涂层相比,具有更高的边际和内部精度。关键字●边际和内部契合度? ●CAD / CAM? ●Ceramill Sintron? ●贱金属合金?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号