首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dentistry >Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques
【24h】

Comparison the Marginal and Internal Fit of Metal Copings Cast from Wax Patterns Fabricated by CAD/CAM and Conventional Wax up Techniques

机译:比较由CAD / CAM和常规打蜡技术制成的蜡样铸造的金属顶盖的边缘和内部配合

获取原文
           

摘要

Statement of Problem: Metal-ceramic crowns are most commonly used as the complete coverage restorations in clinical daily use. Disadvantages of conventional hand-made wax-patterns introduce some alternative ways by means of CAD/CAM technologies. Purpose: This study compares the marginal and internal fit of copings cast from CAD/CAM and conventional fabricated wax-patterns. Materials and Method: Twenty-four standardized brass dies were prepared and randomly divided into 2 groups according to the wax-patterns fabrication method (CAD/CAM technique and conventional method) (n=12). All the wax-patterns were fabricated in a standard fashion by means of contour, thickness and internal relief (M1-M12: representative of CAD/CAM group, C1-C12: representative of conventional group). CAD/CAM milling machine (Cori TEC 340i; imes-icore GmbH, Eiterfeld, Germany) was used to fabricate the CAD/CAM group wax-patterns. The copings cast from 24 wax-patterns were cemented to the corresponding dies. For all the coping-die assemblies cross-sectional technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fit at 15 points. The Student’s t - test was used for statistical analysis (α=0.05). Results: The overall mean (SD) for absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) was 254.46 (25.10) um for CAD/CAM group and 88.08(10.67) um for conventional group (control). The overall mean of internal gap total (IGT) was 110.77(5.92) um for CAD/CAM group and 76.90 (10.17) um for conventional group. The Student’s t-test revealed significant differences between 2 groups. Marginal and internal gaps were found to be significantly higher at all measured areas in CAD/CAM group than conventional group ( p & 0.001).? Conclusion: Within limitations of this study, conventional method of wax-pattern fabrication produced copings with significantly better marginal and internal fit than CAD/CAM (machine-milled) technique. All the factors for 2 groups were standardized except wax pattern fabrication technique, therefore, only the conventional group results in copings with clinically acceptable margins of less than 120um.
机译:问题陈述:在日常临床使用中,金属陶瓷冠最常用作完全覆盖的修复体。传统手工蜡样的缺点是通过CAD / CAM技术引入了一些替代方法。目的:本研究比较了用CAD / CAM和传统的蜡模制作的顶盖的边缘和内部配合。材料和方法:制备二十四个标准化黄铜模具,根据蜡样制作方法(CAD / CAM技术和常规方法)将其随机分为2组(n = 12)。通过轮廓,厚度和内部浮雕(M1-M12:代表CAD / CAM组,C1-C12:代表常规组),以标准方式制造所有蜡图案。使用CAD / CAM铣床(Cori TEC 340i;德国埃特费尔德的imes-icore GmbH)制造CAD / CAM组蜡图案。由24个蜡模铸造的顶盖被粘接到相应的模具上。对于所有应对模具组件,均采用横截面技术评估15个点的边际和内部拟合。学生的t检验用于统计分析(α= 0.05)。结果:CAD / CAM组的绝对边缘差异(AMD)的总体平均值(SD)为254.46(25.10)um,常规组(对照组)为88.08(10.67)um。 CAD / CAM组的总内部间隙总计(IGT)平均为110.77(5.92)um,常规组为76.90(10.17)um。学生的t检验显示两组之间存在显着差异。在CAD / CAM组中,在所有测量区域的边缘和内部间隙均显着高于常规组(p <0.001)。结论:在本研究的范围内,蜡模制作的传统方法所产生的顶盖具有比CAD / CAM(机器铣削)技术更好的边缘和内部配合。除蜡样制作技术外,两组的所有因素均已标准化,因此,只有常规组的应对方法临床上可接受的余量小于120um。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号