首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Current Ophthalmology >A comparative study on visual and optical performance of Akreos AO and Kontur AB IOLs after phacoemulsification cataract surgery
【24h】

A comparative study on visual and optical performance of Akreos AO and Kontur AB IOLs after phacoemulsification cataract surgery

机译:白内障超声乳化白内障手术后Akreos AO和Kontur AB IOL的视觉和光学性能比较研究。

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose Akreos AO and Kontur AB are two commonly used intraocular lenses (IOLs) in Iran. This study was designed to evaluate the visual performance of these lenses. Methods In a comparative interventional study, 35 patients (70 eyes) were recruited, and each IOL was implanted in one eye of the patients, randomly. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, aberrometric analysis, and depth of focus were evaluated 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. A visual quality questionnaire was also filled for each eye, and the results were compared. Results Mean age of the patients was 60.97?±?7.00 years. BCVA was not significantly different between the two eyes, before, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively (p?>?0.05 for all). Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity was not different between the two lenses instead of photopic 18 cycles per degree, 3 months postoperatively and in mesopic 6 cycles per degree 1 month postoperatively (p?=?0.034 and p?=?0.002, respectively). Aberrometric factors including HoRMS, Total RMS, and Higher order without Z(4,0) were not significantly different between the two lenses (p?>?0.05 for all), but they were slightly lower for Akreos AO. Post-operative distance-corrected visual acuity for intermediate and near vision were not different between the two groups (p?>?0.05, respectively). Conclusion Visual performance of Akreos AO and Kontur AB is similar. However, contrast sensitivity and aberrometric parameters are slightly better for Akreos AO IOL.
机译:目的Akreos AO和Kontur AB是伊朗的两种常用的人工晶状体(IOL)。这项研究旨在评估这些镜片的视觉性能。方法在一项比较性干预研究中,招募了35例患者(70眼),并将每个IOL随机植入患者的一只眼中。术后1个月和3个月评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA),对比敏感度,像差分析和聚焦深度。还为每只眼睛填写了视觉质量问卷,并对结果进行了比较。结果患者的平均年龄为60.97±7.00岁。术前,术后1个月和术后3个月,两只眼睛的BCVA没有显着差异(所有p> 0.05)。两种镜片之间的明视和中视对比敏感度没有差异,而不是术后3个月每度18个周期的明视和术后1个月每度6个周期的中度(分别为p?= 0.034和p?=?0.002)。像差因素包括HoRMS,总RMS和不带Z(4,0)的高阶像差在两个透镜之间没有显着差异(所有p均> 0.05),但对于Akreos AO则稍低。两组术后中距离和近距离视力矫正视力无差异(分别为p≥0.05)。结论Akreos AO和Kontur AB的视觉性能相似。但是,Akreos AO IOL的对比度灵敏度和像差参数稍好一些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号