...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Sciences >Comparison of the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials and gypsum products
【24h】

Comparison of the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials and gypsum products

机译:使用各种压印材料和石膏制品构造的石膏模型的表面粗糙度的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background/purpose This study compared the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials, gypsum products, and storage times before repouring. Materials and methods Three alginate impression materials, four commercial silicone impression materials, and three types of gypsum product (MG crystal rock, Super hard stone, and MS plaster) were used. Impression materials were mixed and poured into five plastic rings (20?mm in diameter and 2?mm high) for each group, and the surfaces of the set gypsum product models of 63 groups, which were poured immediately, and 1 hour and 24 hours later, were assessed using a surface roughness tester. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's comparison tests were used for the statistical analyses. Results The surface roughness: (1) was greater for most specimens constructed from alginate impression material (2.72?±?0.45–7.42?±?0.66?μm) than from silicone impression materials (1.86?±?0.19–2.75?±?0.44?μm); (2) differed with the type of gypsum product when using alginate impression materials (surface roughness of Super hard stone??MG crystal rock??MS plaster), but differed little for silicone impression materials; and (3) differed very little with the storage time before repouring. Conclusion The surface roughness of stone models was mainly determined by the type of alginate impression material, and was less affected by the type of silicone rubber impression material or gypsum product, or the storage time before repouring.
机译:背景/目的本研究比较了使用各种压印材料,石膏产品和浇筑前的储存时间构造的石膏模型的表面粗糙度。材料和方法使用了三种藻酸盐印模材料,四种市售有机硅印模材料和三种类型的石膏产品(MG水晶石,超硬石和MS石膏)。混合压模材料,每组倒入五个塑料环(直径20?mm,高2?mm)中,并立即,分别于1小时和24小时倒入63组固定石膏产品模型的表面之后,使用表面粗糙度测试仪进行评估。统计分析采用单向方差分析和Bonferroni的比较检验。结果表面粗糙度:(1)对于大多数由藻酸盐压印材料(2.72±±0.45–7.42±±0.66?μm)制成的标本,其表面粗糙度要大于由有机硅压印材料(1.86±±0.19–2.75±±0.44)制成的样品?μm); (2)使用藻酸盐印模材料时,石膏产品的类型有所不同(超硬石的表面粗糙度>?MG水晶岩?> MS灰泥),但硅树脂印模材料的差异不大; (3)浇注前的储存时间差异很小。结论石材模型的表面粗糙度主要取决于藻酸盐印模材料的类型,而对硅橡胶印模材料或石膏产品的类型或浇注前的储存时间的影响较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号