首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Analysis of “Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations”
【24h】

Analysis of “Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations”

机译:分析“血糖仪与参考标准中的毛细管和静脉血糖准确性:研究设计对准确性评估的影响”

获取原文
       

摘要

The article by Macleod and coauthors outlines an accuracy study of two blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMSs) against glucose-oxidase- and hexokinase-based assays showing how the reference/comparison method and inappropriate sample comparisons can affect accuracy conclusions. The dangers of independent institutions producing inappropriate conclusions when the methodology used for product regulatory or registration accuracy requirements is not according to best practice are stressed. The authors highlight several important aspects of a multistep accuracy evaluation protocol. However, it is essential that anyone undertaking or reporting BGMS accuracy studies should have a clear understanding of each and every protocol point, best practice, and how each can influence accuracy conclusions. Claims against regulatory accuracy criteria should be made only if the detailed specified protocol design and analysis is followed.
机译:Macleod及其合作者的文章概述了两种血糖监测系统(BGMS)针对基于葡萄糖氧化酶和己糖激酶的检测方法的准确性研究,显示了参考/比较方法和不适当的样品比较如何影响准确性结论。强调了独立机构在产品监管或注册准确性要求所使用的方法不符合最佳实践的情况下得出不适当结论的危险。作者强调了多步准确性评估协议的几个重要方面。但是,进行或报告BGMS准确性研究的任何人都必须对每个协议要点,最佳实践以及每个因素如何影响准确性结论有清楚的了解。仅在遵循详细指定的协议设计和分析的情况下,才可提出针对监管准确性标准的声明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号