首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects >Evaluation of strain in mandibular denture-supporting area in three different occlusal schemes during jaw movements
【24h】

Evaluation of strain in mandibular denture-supporting area in three different occlusal schemes during jaw movements

机译:在三种不同的咬合方案下颌运动中下颌假牙支撑区域的应变评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background. Various occlusal schemes have been introduced over the years to enhance the stability, comfort, beauty and function of complete denture, of which lingualized, bilateral balanced and monoplane occlusions are the most recommended. The aim of this study was to compare the strain in mandibular denture-supporting structures in three different occlusal schemes. Methods. Two mandibular and maxillary models were simulated using epoxy resin, and strain gauges were embedded on each side of the mandible in mental foramen, buccal shelf and distolingual area. Strain values were measured in three occlusal schemes at centric occlusion protrusive and lateral movements. Data were analyzed with one-way and three-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Tukey tests. The significant level was set at 0.05. Results. The mean strain in denture-supporting area was lower in monoplane occlusion than the two other occlusal schemes, and the mean of values in the buccal shelf was higher than that of mental foramen and distolingual area. In all the three occlusal schemes, the mean strain values on the working side were higher than those on the non-working side during eccentric movements. Conclusion. Monoplane occlusal scheme imposed lower strain on denture-supporting area, with the buccal shelf being the primary strain-bearing area to tolerate more pressure than the rest of the denture-supporting areas. In terms of strain distribution scheme, in all the three occlusal schemes, the working side received more strain than the non-working side during eccentric movements.
机译:背景。多年来,已经引入了各种咬合方案以增强全口义齿的稳定性,舒适性,美观性和功能,其中最推荐使用舌侧,双侧平衡和单平面咬合。这项研究的目的是比较三种不同咬合方案下颌义齿支持结构中的应变。方法。使用环氧树脂模拟了两个下颌和上颌模型,并且应变仪分别嵌入在下颌骨的每个孔中,分别位于智力孔,颊架子和舌侧区域。在三个咬合方案中,在中心咬合突出和横向运动时测量应变值。使用单向和三向方差分析对数据进行分析,然后进行事后Tukey测试。显着水平设定为0.05。结果。在单平面咬合中,义齿支撑区域的平均应变低于其他两个咬合方案,颊架中的平均数值高于智力孔和舌侧区域。在所有三种咬合方案中,在偏心运动期间,工作侧的平均应变值高于非工作侧的平均应变值。结论。单平面咬合方案对义齿支撑区域施加了较低的应变,颊架是主要的应力承受区域,比其余义齿支撑区域承受更大的压力。就应变分布方案而言,在所有三种咬合方案中,在偏心运动期间,工作侧比非工作侧承受的应变更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号