...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects >Effect of different surface treatments on repair micro-shear bond strength of silica- and zirconia-filled composite resins
【24h】

Effect of different surface treatments on repair micro-shear bond strength of silica- and zirconia-filled composite resins

机译:不同表面处理对填充二氧化硅和氧化锆的复合树脂的微剪切粘合强度的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and aims. Effect of surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composite resins might be different due to their dissimilar fillers. The aim was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on repair micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of silica- (Spectrum TPH) and zirconia-filled (Filtek Z250) composite resins. Materials and methods. Twenty-seven composite resin blocks were made from each type of composite resin: Z250 and Spectrum TPH. After aging, blocks of each type were randomly divided into three groups according to surface treatments: alloy primer, silane, and only surface roughening. Subsequently, each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups based on the adhesive system used: Single Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, and Margin Bond. Four composite resin columns were added on each block. After thermocycling, μSBStest were done at cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data was analysed using mul-tifactor ANOVA, one-way ANOVA and a post-hoc Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05). Results. Analysis of data showed that the effect of composite resin type was not significant (p 0.05), but the effects of the type of surface treatment (p = 0.01) and the type of adhesive system (p = 0.01) were significant on repair μSBS. In addi-tion, the cumulative effect of the composite type-surface treatment and the composite type with the type of adhesive system were not statistically significant (p 0.05). However, the cumulative effects of the adhesive system-surface treatment (p = 0.03) and the composite type-the adhesive system-surface treatments (p = 0.002) were significant. Conclusion. Although repair μSBS values of both silica- and zirconia-filled composite resins were similar, use of differ-ent combinations of surface treatments and adhesive systems affected their repair μSBS differently.
机译:背景和目标。表面处理对老化的复合树脂的修复粘结强度的影响可能因填充剂不同而有所不同。目的是评估不同表面处理对二氧化硅(Spectrum TPH)和氧化锆填充(Filtek Z250)复合树脂的修复微剪切粘结强度(μSBS)的影响。材料和方法。由每种类型的复合树脂(Z250和Spectrum TPH)制成了27种复合树脂块。老化后,根据表面处理将每种类型的块随机分为三组:合金底漆,硅烷和仅表面粗糙化。随后,根据所使用的粘合剂系统,将每组进一步细分为3个子组:单键,Clearfil SE键和保证金键。在每个块上添加四个复合树脂柱。热循环后,以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度进行μSBStest。使用多因素ANOVA,单向ANOVA和事后Bonferroni检验(α= 0.05)分析数据。结果。数据分析表明,复合树脂类型的影响不显着(p> 0.05),但是表面处理类型(p = 0.01)和粘合剂体系类型(p = 0.01)对修复μSBS的影响显着。此外,复合型表面处理和复合型与胶粘剂体系类型的累积效果没有统计学意义(p> 0.05)。但是,粘合剂体系表面处理(p = 0.03)和复合类型粘合剂体系表面处理(p = 0.002)的累积效果是显着的。结论。尽管填充二氧化硅和氧化锆的复合树脂的修复μSBS值相似,但是表面处理和粘合剂体系的不同组合的使用对修复μSBS的影响不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号