...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2.
【24h】

The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2.

机译:陶瓷表面处理对复合树脂与IPS Empress 2的微剪切粘合强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: An increasing demand for esthetic restorations has resulted in the development of new ceramic systems, but fracture of veneering ceramics still remains the primary cause of failure. Porcelain repair frequently involves replacement with composite resin, but the bond strength between composite resin and all-ceramic coping materials has not been studied extensively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different ceramic surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin to IPS Empress 2 coping material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen 7 x 7 x 1 mm(3) lithia disilicate-based core ceramic plates were fabricated using the lost wax technique. The plates were divided into eight groups, and eight different surface treatments were performed: (1) no treatment (NT); (2) airborne-particle abrasion with 50-mum alumina particles (Al); (3) acid etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 1 min (HF); (4) silane coating (S); (5) AlHF; (6) AlS; (7) HFS; and (8) AlHFS. Then, ten composite resin cylinders (0.8-mm diameter x 0.5-mm height) were light-polymerized onto the ceramic plates in each group. Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred. The fracture sites were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine the location of failure during debonding and to examine the surface treatment effects. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison (Dunnet T3) tests were used for statistical analysis of data. RESULTS: The mean micro-shear bond strength values (SD) in MPa were--NT: 4.10 (3.06), Al: 7.56 (4.11), HF: 14.04 (2.60), S: 14.58 (2.14), AlHF: 15.56 (3.36), AlS: 23.02 (4.17), HFS: 24.7 (4.43), AlHFS: 26.0 (3.71). ANOVA indicated the influence of surface treatment was significant (p < 0.0001). SEM analysis did not reveal entirely cohesive failure in any composite or ceramic. CONCLUSION: The micro-shear bond strength of a composite resin to IPS Empress 2 was significantly different depending on the surface treatment method. Among the investigated methods, silane coating after airborne-particle abrasion and etching was the most effective surface treatment in terms of bond strength increase.
机译:目的:对美学修复体的需求不断增长,导致了新陶瓷系统的发展,但贴面陶瓷的断裂仍然是导致失败的主要原因。瓷修复经常涉及用复合树脂替代,但是复合树脂与全陶瓷覆盖材料之间的结合强度尚未得到广泛研究。这项研究的目的是评估不同陶瓷表面处理对复合树脂与IPS Empress 2顶盖材料的微剪切粘合强度的影响。材料与方法:使用失蜡技术制造了16块7 x 7 x 1 mm(3)锂基二硅酸盐基陶瓷陶瓷板。将板分成八组,并进行八种不同的表面处理:(1)不处理(NT); (2)用50微米的氧化铝颗粒(Al)进行空气传播的颗粒磨损; (3)用9.6%的氢氟酸(HF)酸蚀1分钟; (4)硅烷涂料(S); (5)AlHF; (6)AlS; (7)HFS; (8)AlHFS。然后,将十个复合树脂圆柱体(直径0.8毫米x高0.5毫米)轻聚合到每组陶瓷板上。每个试样以0.5mm / min的十字头速度经受剪切载荷,直到发生断裂。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查断裂部位,以确定脱粘过程中的失效位置并检查表面处理效果。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和多重比较(Dunnet T3)测试对数据进行统计分析。结果:以MPa为单位的平均微剪切粘合强度值(SD)为--NT:4.10(3.06),Al:7.56(4.11),HF:14.04(2.60),S:14.58(2.14),AlHF:15.56( 3.36),AlS:23.02(4.17),HFS:24.7(4.43),AlHFS:26.0(3.71)。方差分析表明表面处理的影响是显着的(p <0.0001)。 SEM分析未发现任何复合材料或陶瓷的完全内聚破坏。结论:复合树脂与IPS Empress 2的微剪切粘结强度根据表面处理方法的不同而有显着差异。在研究的方法中,就结合强度的提高而言,气载颗粒磨蚀和蚀刻后的硅烷涂层是最有效的表面处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号