...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Drug Assessment >Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy
【24h】

Comparison of healthcare utilization among managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with multiple sclerosis treated with emergent versus established disease modifying therapy

机译:接受急诊治疗与既定疾病治疗的诊断为多发性硬化的管理型医疗补助患者之间医疗保健利用的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Emerging disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have evolved as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety of established DMTs (interferons, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod and mitoxantrone) have been well studied and clinical trials with small sample sizes have suggested that emerging DMTs (iteriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate/BG-12, alemtuzumab and pegylated IFN) may have distinct advantages relative to established DMTs including better outcomes and reduced healthcare resource utilization. However, there is limited real-world information regarding which DMTs (established vs. emerging) provide the best clinical response and outcomes in managed care populations of patients with MS. Aims: To compare MS related healthcare use within one year of initiating emergent and established DMTs among Managed Medicaid individuals diagnosed with MS in the US. Methods: A large national sample of patient-level administrative healthcare claims data was used for this analysis. MS patients aged 18?years and over with a new prescription fill for an established or emergent DMT between 2013 and 2016 were evaluated. Patients were eligible if they were continuously enrolled in a health plan with pharmacy and medical coverage for at least 6?months before and 1?year after initiation of therapy. Four types of healthcare use were examined: MS-related hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and relapse events (inpatient and outpatient). Multivariate negative binomial models with robust standard errors were used to estimate the association between MS related healthcare use and type of DMT. All models adjusted for age, gender, Charlson index and geographic region. Results: During the study period, 6981 Managed Medicaid individuals with a MS diagnosis initiated a DMT. Of those, 79.8% were female, 50.4% were aged 40–64?years and 21.5% were on emergent DMTs. Emergent DMT users had fewer hospitalizations compared to first generation DMT users within one year of initiating therapy (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]?=?0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88) and fewer outpatient relapses (ARR = 0.86%, CI: 0.79–0.95). Differences in inpatient relapses and ER visits were not observed by DMT type. Conclusions: This study suggests emergent DMTs are associated with reduced MS-related hospitalizations and outpatient relapses within one year of initiating therapy. Studies examining a longer treatment time frame and additional outcomes are warranted to confirm these findings.
机译:背景:新兴的疾病改良疗法(DMT)已经发展成为多发性硬化症(MS)患者的替代疗法。已经对成熟的DMT(干扰素,醋酸格拉替雷,那他珠单抗,芬戈莫德和米托蒽醌)的功效和安全性进行了很好的研究,并且以小样本进行的临床试验表明,正在出现的DMT(艾替氟米特,富马酸二甲酯/ BG-12,阿仑单抗和聚乙二醇化IFN)相对于已建立的DMT,它可能具有明显的优势,包括更好的结果和减少的医疗资源利用。但是,关于在管理MS的患者中哪些DMT(既定的还是新兴的)提供最佳的临床反应和结果的现实信息有限。目的:比较美国诊断为MS的受管医疗补助个人在启动紧急和既定DMT一年内与MS相关的医疗保健用途。方法:使用全国范围内患者级别的行政医疗索赔数据的大量样本进行此分析。对2013年至2016年间年龄在18岁及以上且已建立或即将出现DMT的新处方药的MS患者进行了评估。如果患者在开始治疗前至少6个月和之后1年连续参加有药房和医疗保险的健康计划,则有资格入选。检查了四种医疗保健用途:与MS相关的住院,急诊室就诊和复发事件(住院和门诊)。具有鲁棒标准误差的多元负二项式模型用于估计MS相关医疗保健使用与DMT类型之间的关联。所有模型都针对年龄,性别,查尔森指数和地理区域进行了调整。结果:在研究期间,有MS诊断的6981名受管理的医疗补助患者开始了DMT。其中,女性占79.8%,年龄在40-64岁之间的占50.4%,而新兴DMT占21.5%。与第一代DMT用户相比,新兴DMT用户在开始治疗后的一年内住院率较低(调整后的风险比[ARR]?=?0.64,95%置信区间[CI]:0.46-0.88),门诊复发率也更低(ARR = 0.86) %,CI:0.79–0.95)。 DMT类型未观察到住院复发和ER就诊的差异。结论:这项研究表明,新兴的DMTs与开始治疗的一年内与MS相关的住院减少和门诊复发相关。研究检查更长的治疗时间框架和其他结果是有必要的,以证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号