...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine >Unstable Hangman's fracture: Anterior or posterior surgery?
【24h】

Unstable Hangman's fracture: Anterior or posterior surgery?

机译:不稳定的Hangman骨折:前路手术还是后路手术?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: Literature evaluating the efficacy and long-term clinico-radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior fixation at C2–C3 for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures is scanty. Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, clinical-radiological outcomes, and complications of ACDF and posterior fixation techniques performed for unstable hangman's fractures. Settings and Design: The study design involves retrospective comparative study. Subjects and Methods: This study conducted from 2012 to 2018 included 21 patients with unstable hangman's fracture (Levine and Edwards Type II, IIa and III). All patients were divided into two groups based on the approach taken for fracture fixation (Group A-anterior approach and Group B-posterior approach). Peri-operative clinical, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and outcomes were evaluated and compared in both the groups. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test and Student's t -test were used. Results: The mean age was 39.8 ± 4.5 years in-group A and 41.3 ± 6.7 years in-group B. The male patients outnumbered the female patients and road traffic accident was the most common cause of unstable fractures. There were statistical significant differences in surgical time ( P = 0.15), operative blood loss, pain-free status postsurgery, and hospital stay ( P = 0.15) between two groups. No statistically significant differences noted in clinic-radiological outcomes in the form of visual analog scale and fusion rate at final follow-up between two groups at final follow-up. Conclusions: The unstable hangman's fractures can be effectively managed with both anterior and posterior approaches with comparable clinico-radiological outcome. A minimally invasive nature, earlier pain-free status, early mobilization with reduced hospitalization make the ACDF efficacious, particularly in cases with no medullary canal in C2 pedicles and traumatic C2–3 disc herniation with listhesis compressing the spinal cord.
机译:背景:评估颈前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和后路C2-C3固定术治疗不稳定的unstable子手骨折的疗效和长期临床放射学结果的文献很少。目的:本研究的目的是比较ACDF和后路固定技术对不稳定的outcomes子手骨折的疗效,临床放射学结果和并发症。设置与设计:研究设计涉及回顾性比较研究。对象和方法:2012年至2018年进行的这项研究包括21例不稳定的子手骨折(Levine和Edwards II型,IIa和III型)。根据骨折固定方法将所有患者分为两组(A组-前入路和B组-后入路)。对两组的围手术期临床,放射学参数,术后并发症和结局进行评估和比较。使用的统计分析:使用卡方检验和学生t检验。结果:A组的平均年龄为39.8±4.5岁,B组的平均年龄为41.3±6.7岁。男性患者多于女性患者,道路交通事故是不稳定骨折的最常见原因。两组的手术时间(P = 0.15),手术失血量,术后无痛状态和住院时间(P = 0.15)有统计学差异。在最终随访时,两组之间在最终随访中,视觉模拟评分和融合率均未见临床放射学结果有统计学上的显着差异。结论:前入路和后入路均可有效治疗不稳定的with子手骨折,临床放射学结果可比。微创的性质,较早的无痛状态,及早的动员以及减少的住院治疗使ACDF变得有效,尤其是在C2椎弓根无延髓管和外伤性C2–3椎间盘突出症且脊髓受压的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号