首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chiropractic medicine >A Comparison Between the Effects of Scapulothoracic Mobilization Plus Physical Therapy With Physical Therapy Alone in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
【24h】

A Comparison Between the Effects of Scapulothoracic Mobilization Plus Physical Therapy With Physical Therapy Alone in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:肩颈颈动脉动员加物理疗法与单独物理疗法对机械性颈痛患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of scapulothoracic (ST) mobilization plus physical therapy (PT) with PT alone in patients with mechanical neck pain. Methods This double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at Shiraz School of Rehabilitation Sciences and involved 46 patients with mechanical neck pain and scapular dyskinesia. The patients were randomly assigned to the ST mobilization + PT group (scapulothoracic mobilization and physical therapy) or the PT group (physical therapy treatment) by a computer-generated randomized table of numbers. Both groups received 5 sessions of treatment during 1 week. Pain intensity and grip strength were evaluated 3 times: baseline, after the first session, and after the fifth session. Furthermore, functional disability of the upper limbs and the neck were evaluated before and at the fifth session. Results The results showed that the pain intensity was reduced and grip strength increased significantly after the first session ( P = .01) and at the end of the treatment ( P = .01) in the ST mobilization + PT group in comparison with the PT group. Also, the mean difference of upper limb ( P = .01) and neck disability ( P = .02) decreased significantly in the ST mobilization + PT group in comparison with the PT group. Conclusion Scapulothoracic mobilization in combination with physical therapy may be superior to physical therapy alone in reducing pain intensity, maximizing grip strength, and reducing upper limb and neck disability in mechanical neck pain.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是比较单纯性肩or炎(ST)和物理疗法(PT)联合PT对机械性颈痛患者的影响。方法该双盲随机临床试验在设拉子康复科学学院进行,涉及46例机械性颈部疼痛和肩cap骨运动障碍患者。通过计算机生成的随机数字表将患者随机分为ST动员+ PT组(肩s动脉动员和物理疗法)或PT组(物理疗法)。两组在1周内接受了5次治疗。评估疼痛强度和握力3次:基线,第一节后和第五节后。此外,在第五节之前和第五节评估了上肢和颈部的功能障碍。结果结果表明,与PT组相比,ST动员+ PT组在第一次治疗后(P = .01)和治疗结束时(P = .01)疼痛强度降低,握力明显增加。组。同样,与PT组相比,ST动员+ PT组上肢平均差异(P = .01)和颈部残疾(P = .02)明显降低。结论肩颈胸膜动员结合物理疗法可能会比单纯物理疗法在减轻疼痛强度,最大化握力和减少机械性颈痛中的上肢和颈部残疾方面优于单独的物理疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号