首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chiropractic medicine >Treatment provider preference of Australian office workers for common neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions
【24h】

Treatment provider preference of Australian office workers for common neurologic and musculoskeletal conditions

机译:澳大利亚上班族对常见神经系统疾病和肌肉骨骼疾病的治疗提供者偏爱

获取原文
       

摘要

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to survey the choice of treatment provider by selected Australian office workers for common conditions that are managed in chiropractic practice.MethodsOffice workers of a medium-sized legal company in Sydney, Australia, were surveyed. The participants (n = 125) were asked to complete a written questionnaire on their preferred treatment choices for common physical conditions, such as back pain, neck pain, and headache.ResultsA total of 81 people returned completed questionnaires. Forty-two people (52%) reported that they would attend a general medical practitioner first for back pain. In comparison, 24% of people reported that they would attend a physiotherapist first for back pain. Eleven people (13%) reported that they would attend a chiropractor first for back pain. Fifty-one percent (51%) of employees reported that their preferred treatment first choice for neck pain was a general practitioner. Chiropractic was rated as third (30%) most common choice for the treatment of neck pain (equal with physiotherapy). The preferred first choice (63% of employees) for headache treatment was a general practitioner. The second most common choice for treatment of headache was a naturopath (50%). Eighty-one percent of employees ranked a general practitioner as their preferred treatment first choice for migraine, and 39% of employees also ranked the general practitioner as the second most common treatment choice for migraine.ConclusionsIn this sample of Australian workers, chiropractic was rated within the top 3 choices for several common neuromusculoskeletal conditions for which they may have chosen a chiropractor. Because of the small sample size and limited parameters of this study, no strong conclusions can be made until further data are collected.
机译:目的本研究的目的是调查所选澳大利亚上班族对于脊椎按摩治疗中常见病情的治疗提供者选择。方法调查了澳大利亚悉尼一家中型法律公司的上班族。参与者(n = 125)被要求填写一份书面问卷,回答他们针对常见身体状况(例如背痛,颈部疼痛和头痛)的首选治疗选择。结果共有81人返回了完整的问卷。有42人(52%)报告说,他们将首先因背部疼痛而去看全科医生。相比之下,有24%的人报告说他们会首先因背部疼痛而去看物理治疗师。十一人(13%)报告说,他们会首先因为脊背疼痛而接受脊医治疗。 51%(51%)的员工表示,全科医生是他们首选的颈部疼痛治疗首选。脊骨疗法被评为治疗颈部疼痛(与物理疗法相当)的第三大选择(30%)。头痛治疗的首选首选(63%的员工)是全科医生。治疗头痛的第二个最常见选择是自然疗法(50%)。有81%的雇员将全科医生列为偏头痛的首选治疗方法,还有39%的雇员将全科医生列为偏头痛的第二种最常见治疗方法。他们可能选择了脊椎治疗师的几种常见神经肌肉骨骼疾病的前3个选择。由于本研究的样本量较小且参数有限,因此在收集到更多数据之前无法得出有力的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号