首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering >Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Delivery Model for an Urban Flexible Pavement
【24h】

Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Delivery Model for an Urban Flexible Pavement

机译:城市柔性路面的生命周期成本分析(LCCA)交付模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Pavement alternative evaluation is a key aspect in decision making process in transportation system planning, design and delivery. This study examined the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) model for flexible road pavement infrastructure delivery in a developing economy using 1.9 km urban road in Effurun Metropolis, Uvwie Local Government Area of Delta State of Nigeria as a case study. The overview of existing knowledge, the importance and evaluation of LCCA of pavement delivery is done. The Pavement delivery and design data used for this study, which were obtained from the Office of the Ministry of Works, Effurun, Delta State of Nigeria, included soil sub-grade CBR results, water content condition, soil type and grain size distribution, the reports of route investigation, vehicular traffic counts, and previous maintenance, material and market survey reports. The pavement design data previously used for the design and procurement of urban roads in the area were used for the design of three competing pavement alternatives models, viz: Hot Rolled Asphalt (HRA), Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement (ICBP) and a third; Do-nothing scenario pavement alternative. The Bill of Engineering Measurements and Evaluation (BEME) was developed for the designed alternative to compute their Life- Cycle Costs (LCCs) using present worth cost (PWC) method with varying interest rates in MS Excel software spread sheets for a design life of 20 years. Regression modeling for the three scenarios was done with computer software’s (SPSS and MS Excel) packages. The model’s data robustness was determined and found to be between 0.95-0.99. The model’s validity and sensitivity were also carried out. The study indicates a 43.8% cost savings with the ICBP alternative over the HRA option. The Do-nothing alternative is non–aesthetical and costliest due to the maintenance cost of reinstating the road structure. The models have significance value of less than 0.001(F) respectively. The developed LCCA template and model are applicable for investment studies and decision making as well as cost effectiveness assessment of pavement and bridge delivery.
机译:路面替代评估是运输系统规划,设计和交付决策过程中的关键方面。这项研究研究了生命周期成本分析(LCCA)模型,以发展中经济体中灵活的道路路面基础设施交付为例,以尼日利亚三角洲Uvwie地方政府区Effurun大都会的1.9公里城市道路为例。概述了现有知识,铺装LCCA的重要性和评估。该研究使用的路面输送和设计数据是从尼日利亚三角州埃夫富隆市工程部办公室获得的,包括土基CBR结果,含水量条件,土壤类型和粒度分布,路线调查报告,车辆流量计数以及先前的维护,物料和市场调查报告。先前用于该地区城市道路设计和采购的路面设计数据用于设计三种竞争性路面替代模型,即:热轧沥青(HRA),联锁混凝土砌块路面(ICBP)和第三种;什么都不做的场景人行道替代方案。工程测量和评估法案(BEME)是为设计替代方案而开发的,它使用现值成本(PWC)方法计算其生命周期成本(LCC),并在MS Excel软件电子表格中使用不同的利率,设计寿命为20年份。使用计算机软件(SPSS和MS Excel)软件包对三种情况进行回归建模。确定了模型的数据健壮性,发现其介于0.95-0.99之间。模型的有效性和敏感性也进行了。研究表明,与HRA相比,使用ICBP替代方案可节省43.8%的成本。由于恢复道路结构的维护成本,“不采取行动”的选择是非美学的,也是最昂贵的。这些模型的显着性值分别小于0.001(F)。开发的LCCA模板和模型适用于投资研究和决策以及人行道和桥梁交付的成本效益评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号