...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Comparison of bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin modified glass ionomer to calcium enriched mixture
【24h】

Comparison of bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin modified glass ionomer to calcium enriched mixture

机译:具有两种不同粘合剂体系的复合树脂和树脂改性的玻璃离聚物与富钙混合物的粘结强度比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: It is necessary to have a proper bond between pulp-capping agent and composite materials to maintain effective coronal seal. Aims: This study aims to compare the shear bond strength of a composite resin with two different adhesive systems and a resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) to calcium-enriched mixture (CEM). Methods: In this study, 30 acrylic blocks (with a central hole 4 mm diameter and 2 mm height) were prepared and filled with CEM. The blocks were divided into three groups: single bond2 (SB) with Filtek Z250, single bond universal (SBU) with Filtek Z250, and RMGI. The restorative materials were placed on the CEM, and shear bond strength was measured. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and games Howell tests. P 0.05). All the failures in composite groups were as cohesive in CEM and in RMGI group was as adhesive. Conclusions: Shear bond strength of composite resin to CEM cement was higher than RMGI irrespective of the type of the adhesive system. The universal bonding system is recommended for bonding of composite to CEM for ease of use.
机译:背景:牙髓封闭剂和复合材料之间必须有适当的结合,以保持有效的冠状封闭。目的:本研究旨在比较具有两种不同粘合剂体系的复合树脂和树脂改性的玻璃离聚物(RMGI)与富含钙的混合物(CEM)的剪切粘结强度。方法:在这项研究中,准备了30个丙烯酸树脂块(中心孔的直径为4毫米,高度为2毫米),并填充了CEM。这些模块分为三组:带Filtek Z250的单键2(SB),带Filtek Z250的单键通用(SBU)和RMGI。将修复材料放在CEM上,并测量剪切粘结强度。使用单向方差分析和游戏Howell测试分析数据。 P 0.05)。复合材料组中的所有失效在CEM中均具有内聚力,而在RMGI组中则具有粘合性。结论:不论胶粘剂体系的类型如何,复合树脂与CEM水泥的剪切粘结强度均高于RMGI。建议使用通用粘合系统将复合材料粘合到CEM,以便于使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号