首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives >Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study
【24h】

Impact of bowel preparation type on the quality of colonoscopy: a multicenter community-based study

机译:肠道准备类型对结肠镜检查质量的影响:基于社区的多中心研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background High-quality bowel preparation is crucial for achieving the goals of colonoscopy. However, choosing a bowel preparation in clinical practice can be challenging because of the many formulations. This study aims to assess the impact the type of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy in a community hospital setting. Methods A retrospective, observational study was conducted utilizing a colonoscopy screening/surveillance database in central Illinois during the period of January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2014. Patients without bowel preparation assessment were excluded from this study. Controlling for the confounders, generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted impact [odds ratio (OR)] of bowel preparation type on the quality of preparation (excellent, good, fair, and poor), and on the detection of advanced adenoma. The association between the time of withdrawal after insertion and the quality of preparation was also examined using a linear model. Results A total of 28,368 colonoscopies; half the patients were male, and the average age was 61±9 years. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in the majority (70.2%) of bowel preparations, followed by sodium sulfate (21.4%), sodium phosphate (2.5%), magnesium sulfate (0.4%), and others. Compared with PEG, magnesium sulfate had a poorer quality of bowel preparations (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4–0.9; p <0.05), whereas the quality of bowel preparation was significantly improved by using sodium sulfate (OR=5.7, 95% CI 5.4–6.1; p <0.001) and sodium phosphate (OR=2.1, 95% CI 1.8–2.5; p <0.001). For those who had adequate bowel preparation, the better quality of preparation significantly increased the detection rate of advanced adenoma (5.0, 3.6, and 2.9% for excellent, good, and fair, respectively). Conclusion When possible, sodium sulfate–based preparations should be recommended in the community setting for colonoscopy because of their high quality of bowel preparation.
机译:背景高质量肠准备对于实现结肠镜检查的目标至关重要。然而,由于存在许多配方,因此在临床实践中选择肠道制剂可能具有挑战性。这项研究旨在评估社区医院环境中肠道准备类型对结肠镜检查质量的影响。方法在2010年1月1日至2014年3月31日期间,使用伊利诺伊州中部的结肠镜检查/监视数据库进行回顾性观察研究。未进行肠道准备评估的患者被排除在本研究之外。为了控制混杂因素,使用广义线性模型来估计肠准备类型对准备质量(优,良,良,差)和晚期腺瘤检测的调整影响[几率(OR)]。还使用线性模型检查了插入后撤回时间与制剂质量之间的关联。结果共28368例结肠镜检查;半数患者为男性,平均年龄为61±9岁。肠准备的大部分(70.2%)中使用了聚乙二醇(PEG),其次是硫酸钠(21.4%),磷酸钠(2.5%),硫酸镁(0.4%)等。与PEG相比,硫酸镁的肠道制剂质量较差(OR = 0.6,95%CI 0.4-0.9; p <0.05),而使用硫酸钠显着改善了肠道制剂的质量(OR = 5.7,95% CI 5.4–6.1; p <0.001)和磷酸钠(OR = 2.1,95%CI 1.8-2.5; p <0.001)。对于那些有充分肠道准备的人来说,更好的准备质量显着提高了晚期腺瘤的检出率(分别为优秀,良好和一般的检出率分别为5.0%,3.6%和2.9%)。结论由于社区肠准备的质量高,在可能的情况下,应建议在社区环境中推荐使用基于硫酸钠的制剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号