首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up
【24h】

Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up

机译:树脂改性的玻璃离子水门汀,可流动复合材料和多元酸改性的树脂复合材料在非龋性宫颈病变中的临床表现:一年的随访

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) often poses a challenge to the clinician. Various restorative materials are available in the market for the restoration of the same. Each material has various advantages and shortcomings. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and to evaluate the clinical performance of capsulated resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), flowable composite, and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) in NCCLs. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 restorations were placed among healthy controls in this clinical trial. A total of 101 restorations were divided into three groups with n = minimum 32 per group (Group 1: 33 restorations, Group 2: 34 restorations, and Group 3: 34 restorations). The restorative materials used were capsulated RMGIC, flowable composite and PMCR. After the placement, the restorations were evaluated for the United States Public Health Services criteria for six parameters, namely retention, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color stability, surface roughness, and sensitivity. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Statistical Analysis: Statistics was performed using SPSS 21.0 version. Chi-square test was done to compare the proportions between groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportion change between time points. Results: There was no statistically significant difference seen among the three groups for retention, color stability, surface roughness, and hypersensitivity. RMGIC had shown superior characteristics in marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration compared to flowable composite and PMCR, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, all the three restorative materials are clinically acceptable for the restoration of NCCLs. RMGIC is superior regarding marginal adaptation and esthetics for restoring NCCLs.
机译:背景:非龋性宫颈病变(NCCL)的修复通常给临床医生带来挑战。市场上可以买到各种各样的修复材料。每种材料都有各种优点和缺点。目的:本研究的目的是比较和评估囊状树脂改性玻璃离聚物水泥(RMGIC),可流动复合材料和多元酸改性复合树脂(PMCR)在NCCL中的临床性能。材料和方法:在该临床试验中,共将101个修复体置于健康对照中。总共101个修复体分为三组,每组n =最少32个(组1:33个修复体,组2:34个修复体,组3:34个修复体)。所使用的修复材料是封装的RMGIC,可流动复合材料和PMCR。放置后,根据美国公共卫生服务的六个标准对修复体进行评估,这些参数包括保留力,边缘适应性,边缘变色,颜色稳定性,表面粗糙度和敏感性。在基线,6个月和12个月时评估修复体。统计分析:使用SPSS 21.0版本进行统计。进行卡方检验以比较各组之间的比例。 Fisher精确检验用于比较时间点之间的比例变化。结果:三组之间在保持力,颜色稳定性,表面粗糙度和超敏性方面无统计学差异。与可流动的复合材料和PMCR相比,RMGIC在边缘适应性和边缘变色方面显示出优异的特性,并且差异具有统计学意义。结论:在本研究的范围内,所有三种修复材料在临床上均可以用于NCCL的修复。 RMGIC在恢复NCCL的边缘适应和美学方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号