【24h】

CFaaS: bilaterally agreed evidence collection

机译:CFaaS:双边商定的证据收集

获取原文
           

摘要

A common cloud forensic model proposed by researchers is ‘Cloud-Forensic-as-a-Service’ where consumers have to access it as a service to collect forensic data from cloud environments. The ‘Cloud-Forensic-as-a-Service’ model raises the question of how it collects digital evidence pertaining to an incident which occurred in the cloud. Currently, types of ‘Cloud-Forensic-as-a-Service’ systems in the literature show that the system is controlled and implemented by the cloud provider, where they unilaterally define the type of evidence that can be collected by the system. A serious limitation of this approach is that it does not offer the consumer sufficient means of performing reasonableness checks to verify that the provider is not accidentally or maliciously contaminating the evidence. To address the problem, the paper proposes a conceptual bilateral Cloud-Forensic-as-a-Service model where both consumers and providers can independently collect, verify the equity of the forensic analysis process and try to resolve potential disputes emerging from the independently collected results. The authors have developed a cloud forensic process model to lead common and significant aspects of a bilateral Cloud-Forensics-as-a-Service model. The paper explicitly discusses the concept of a bilateral Cloud-Forensic-as-a-Service model.
机译:研究人员提出的一种常见的云取证模型是“云取证即服务”,消费者必须将其作为服务来从云环境中收集取证数据。 “云法务即服务”模型提出了一个问题,即它如何收集与云中发生的事件有关的数字证据。当前,文献中的“云法医即服务”系统的类型表明,该系统是由云提供商控制和实施的,它们单方面定义了系统可以收集的证据类型。这种方法的一个严重局限性在于,它不能为消费者提供足够的手段来进行合理性检查,以验证提供者没有意外或恶意地污染证据。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一个概念性的双边云法务即服务模型,消费者和提供者都可以独立收集,验证法证分析过程的公平性并尝试解决由独立收集的结果引起的潜在争议。 。作者开发了一种云取证流程模型,以领导双边云取证即服务模型的常见和重要方面。该文件明确讨论了双边云法医即服务模型的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号