首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine Research >Renal Function and Outcomes With Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Inotropes in End-Stage Heart Failure: A Retrospective Single Center Study
【24h】

Renal Function and Outcomes With Use of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Inotropes in End-Stage Heart Failure: A Retrospective Single Center Study

机译:终末期心力衰竭患者使用左心室辅助装置植入和正性肌力治疗的肾功能和结果:回顾性单中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and inotrope therapy serve as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as destination therapy in patients who are not heart transplant candidates. End-stage heart failure patients often have impaired renal function, and renal outcomes after LVAD therapy versus inotrope therapy have not been evaluated.Methods: In this study, 169 patients with continuous flow LVAD therapy and 20 patients with continuous intravenous inotrope therapy were analyzed. The two groups were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after LVAD or inotrope therapy was started. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), BTT rate, and mortality for 6 months following LVAD or inotrope therapy were studied. Results between the groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square with continuity correction or Fischer’s exact at the significance level of 0.05.Results: Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was not statistically different between the two groups, with P = 0.471, 0.429, and 0.847 at baseline, 3 and 6 months, respectively. The incidence of AKI, RRT, and BTT was not statistically different. Mortality was less in the inotrope group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Intravenous inotrope therapy in end-stage heart failure patients is non-inferior for mortality, incidence of AKI, need for RRT, and renal function for 6-month follow-up when compared to LVAD therapy. Further studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of inotropes versus LVAD implantation on renal function and outcomes over a longer time period.J Clin Med Res. 2017;9(7):596-604doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3039w
机译:背景:左心室辅助设备(LVAD)和药物治疗疗法可作为移植的桥梁(BTT)或非心脏移植候选患者的目的地疗法。终末期心力衰竭患者通常会出现肾功能受损,并且未评估LVAD治疗与inotrope治疗后的肾结局。方法:在本研究中,分析了169例连续流LVAD治疗患者和20例持续静脉内接种inotrope治疗患者。两组分别在基线,LVAD或开始治疗后3个月和6个月进行评估。研究了急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率,是否需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT),BTT率以及LVAD或inotrope治疗后6个月的死亡率。用Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验对连续性校正或Fischer精确度在0.05的显着性水平进行比较。结果:两组的平均肾小球滤过率(GFR)在统计学上无统计学差异,P =在基线,3个月和6个月时分别为0.471、0.429和0.847。 AKI,RRT和BTT的发生率无统计学差异。孕激素治疗组的死亡率较低(P <0.001)。结论:晚期心力衰竭患者的静脉输卵管治疗在6个月的随访中死亡率,AKI发生率,RRT需求和肾功能方面均不逊色与LVAD治疗相比。需要进一步的研究来比较正性肌力药物和LVAD植入物在更长时间内对肾功能和预后的有效性。JClin Med Res。 2017; 9(7):596-604doi:https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3039w

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号