首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease >Advanced Electrocardiography Identifies Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Tracks Serial Change over Time
【24h】

Advanced Electrocardiography Identifies Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Tracks Serial Change over Time

机译:先进的心电图可识别非缺血性心肌病中的左心室收缩功能障碍,并跟踪随时间变化的系列变化

获取原文
       

摘要

Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) has poor specificity and positive predictive value, even when including major ECG abnormalities, such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) within the criteria for diagnosis. Although machine-read ECG algorithms do not provide information on LVSD, advanced ECG (A-ECG), using multiparameter scores, has superior diagnostic utility to strictly conventional ECG for identifying various cardiac pathologies, including LVSD. Methods: We evaluated the diagnostic utility of A-ECG in a case-control study of 40 patients with LVSD (LV ejection fraction 50% by echocardiography), due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), and 39 other patients without LVSD. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for LVSD were determined after applying a previously validated probabilistic A-ECG score for LVSD to stored standard (10 s) clinical 12L ECGs. In 25 of the NICM patients who had serial ECGs and echocardiograms, changes in the A-ECG score versus in echocardiographic LV ejection fraction were also studied to determine the level of agreement between the two tests. Results: Analyses by A-ECG had a sensitivity of 95% for LVSD (93% if excluding N = 11 patients with LBBB) and specificity of 95%. In the 29 NICM patients without LBBB who had serial ECGs, sensitivity improved to 97% when all ECGs were considered. By comparison, human readers in a busy clinical environment had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 63%. A-ECG score trajectories demonstrated improvement, deterioration or no change in LVSD, which agreed with echocardiography, in 76% of cases (n = 25). Conclusion: A-ECG scoring detects LVSD due to NICM with high sensitivity and specificity. Serial A-ECG score trajectories also represent a method for inexpensively demonstrating changes in LVSD. A-ECG scoring may be of particular value in areas where echocardiography is unavailable, or as a gatekeeper for echocardiography.
机译:基于心电图(ECG)的左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)检测具有差的特异性和阳性预测值,即使在诊断标准中包括主要的心电图异常,例如左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)时也是如此。尽管机器读取的心电图算法无法提供有关LVSD的信息,但使用多参数评分的高级心电图(A-ECG)在诊断包括LVSD在内的各种心脏病变方面具有优于严格的常规心电图诊断的优势。方法:我们在40例由于非缺血性心肌病(NICM)导致的LVSD患者(通过超声心动图检查发现LV射血分数<50%)和其他39例没有LVSD的患者中,对A-ECG的诊断效用进行了评估。在将先前验证的LVSD概率A-ECG分数应用于已存储的标准(10 s)临床12L ECG之后,确定LVSD的诊断敏感性和特异性。在25例行连续心电图和超声心动图检查的NICM患者中,还研究了A-ECG评分与超声心动图左室射血分数的变化,以确定两次测试之间的一致性水平。结果:A-ECG分析对LVSD的敏感性为95%(如果排除N = 11名LBBB患者,则为93%),特异性为95%。在29例无LBBB的连续心电图的NICM患者中,考虑所有心电图后,敏感性提高到97%。相比之下,在繁忙的临床环境中,人类读者的敏感性为90%,特异性为63%。 A-ECG得分轨迹显示,在76%的病例中,n LVSD改善,恶化或没有改变,这与超声心动图一致(n = 25)。结论:A-ECG评分可检测出NICM引起的LVSD,具有很高的灵敏度和特异性。连续的A-ECG得分轨迹也代表了一种廉价地证明LVSD变化的方法。 A-ECG评分在超声心动图不可用的区域或作为超声心动图的看门人可能具有特殊价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号