...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >Optimal technique of radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix in developing countries: Dosimetric and logistic comparison
【24h】

Optimal technique of radiotherapy for carcinoma cervix in developing countries: Dosimetric and logistic comparison

机译:发展中国家宫颈癌放疗的最佳技术:剂量学和逻辑学比较

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: Carcinoma cervix is the most common malignancy affecting women in developing countries. Radical radiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment in more than 90% of patients. The present study is a dosimetric and logistic comparison of various techniques of radiotherapy, namely two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2DCRT), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods: All the patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans for simulation. 2DCRT, 3DCRT, and IMRT plans were generated in 24 patients and dosimetrically compared. Radiotherapy treatment time involved in each technique was analyzed in 27 treated patients. Results: The planning target volume (PTV) coverage was best in 3DCRT technique with a median coverage of 99.9% as compared to IMRT (99.3%) and 2DCRT (82.2%). There was progressive sparing of all the organs at risk in IMRT as compared to 3DCRT. The total planning time was longest in IMRT (332.1 min) and shortest in 2DCRT (11.7 min). The mean treatment time for the delivery of each fraction of 2DCRT, 3DCRT, and IMRT were 14.3, 13.6, and 24.7 min, respectively. Conclusion: 3DCRT technique is the most optimal technique for radical radiotherapy of cervical cancers with optimum PTV coverage, acceptable planning time, and minimal treatment time as compared to IMRT. 2DCRT technique should be limited to the setting where CT simulation is unavailable.
机译:目的:宫颈癌是影响发展中国家妇女的最常见恶性肿瘤。根治性放射疗法是90%以上患者的主要治疗手段。本研究是放射治疗的各种技术的剂量学和逻辑学比较,即二维常规放射治疗(2DCRT),三维保形放射治疗(3DCRT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)。方法:所有患者均接受对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描以进行模拟。在24位患者中生成了2DCRT,3DCRT和IMRT计划,并进行了剂量学比较。在27名接受治疗的患者中分析了每种技术涉及的放疗治疗时间。结果:在3DCRT技术中,计划目标量(PTV)覆盖率最高,与IMRT(99.3%)和2DCRT(82.2%)相比,中位覆盖率为99.9%。与3DCRT相比,IMRT中所有有风险的器官均逐渐减少。总计划时间在IMRT中最长(332.1分钟),在2DCRT中最短(11.7分钟)。交付2DCRT,3DCRT和IMRT各个部分的平均治疗时间分别为14.3、13.6和24.7分钟。结论:与IMRT相比,3DCRT技术是宫颈癌根治性放射治疗的最佳技术,具有最佳的PTV覆盖范围,可接受的计划时间和最短的治疗时间。 2DCRT技术应限于无法使用CT模拟的设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号