首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >A randomized phase III study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and subsequent systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone for colorectal cancer patients with curatively resected liver metastases (Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer 32)
【24h】

A randomized phase III study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and subsequent systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone for colorectal cancer patients with curatively resected liver metastases (Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer 32)

机译:肝动脉灌注化疗联合5-氟尿嘧啶及其后全身化疗与全身化疗的随机III期研究,用于结直肠癌肝转移治愈的大肠癌患者(日本癌症多学科治疗基金会32)

获取原文
       

摘要

Aim: This randomized phase III trial compared hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) versus UFT/LV alone for patients with curatively resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: The study was designed to include 280 patients to be randomized to receive either HAI with 5-FU followed by UFT/LV (Arm A) or UFT/LV alone (Arm B) to assess whether HAI chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Forty-four patients were randomized. Three-year DFS was relatively worse in the experimental arm although this difference was not statistically significant (43.5% in Arm A vs. 58% in Arm B; hazard ratio [HR], 1.304; P = 0.534). The experimental arm also tended to have a worse 3-year overall survival rate (80.2% in Arm A vs. 85.2% in Arm B; HR, 2.255; P = 0.192). There was no significant difference in the frequency of Grade 3 or higher toxicities between the two arms. Conclusion: Although this study was limited by a small sample size after early study termination, our analysis found that HAI with 5-FU followed by UFT/LV did not improve the DFS of patients with curatively resected liver metastases from CRC compared with UFT/LV alone. The future studies are necessary to evaluate the survival benefit of HAI in combination with newer systemic chemotherapeutic agents for patients with resectable liver metastases from CRC.
机译:目的:该随机III期临床试验比较了肝切除术治愈的肝转移患者,将肝动脉输注(HAI)化疗与5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU),尿嘧啶/替加氟(UFT)和亚叶酸(LV)相比,单独使用UFT / LV进行了比较。大肠癌(CRC)。方法:该研究旨在包括280名患者,随机接受5-FU HAI治疗,然后接受UFT / LV(Arm A)或仅接受UFT / LV(Arm B)治疗,以评估HAI化疗能否改善无病生存期( DFS)。结果:44例患者被随机分组​​。三年DFS在实验组中相对较差,尽管差异无统计学意义(A组为43.5%,B组为58%;危险比[HR]为1.304; P = 0.534)。实验组的3年总生存率也较差(A组为80.2%,B组为85.2%; HR为2.255; P = 0.192)。两组之间的3级或更高毒性反应的频率没有显着差异。结论:尽管这项研究受到早期研究终止后样本量较小的限制,但我们的分析发现,与UFT / LV相比,HAI联合5-FU联合UFT / LV并不能改善CRC治愈性肝转移患者的DFS单独。未来的研究对于评估HAI与较新的全身化学治疗药物联合治疗可切除的CRC肝转移患者的生存益处是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号