首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized phase II trial of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
【24h】

Randomized phase II trial of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

机译:结肠癌切除后肝转移患者的辅助肝动脉输注和全身化疗联合贝伐珠单抗或不联合贝伐单抗的II期随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Add systemic bevacizumab (Bev) to adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus systemic therapy after liver resection to increase recurrence-free survival (RFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to HAI plus systemic therapy with or without Bev. If 1-year RFS of >/= 80% was obtained in Bev arm, then the regimen would be studied further. HAI with fluorodeoxyuridine plus dexamethasone was given on days 1 to 14 of a 5-week cycle. Systemic therapy and Bev 5 mg/kg was delivered on days 15 and 29: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m(2) infusion for 2 days (if patients received prior oxaliplatin, then irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) was used). RFS and survival were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The two arms had similar characteristics: synchronous disease (66% v 63%), more than one metastasis (84% v 74%), and clinical risk score >/= 3 (50% v 46%) for no Bev versus Bev arms, respectively. With a median follow-up of 30 months, 4-year survival was 85% and 81% (P = .5), and 4-year RFS was 46% versus 37%; 1-year RFS was 83% and 71% (P = .4) for no Bev versus Bev arms. Bilirubin > 3 mg/dL was seen in zero of 38 versus five of 35 patients (P = .02) and biliary stents were placed in zero versus four patients (P = .05) in no Bev versus Bev arms. CONCLUSION: The addition of Bev to adjuvant HAI plus systemic therapy after liver resection did not seem to increase RFS or survival but appeared to increase biliary toxicity. Four-year survival was 85% and 81% for no Bev and Bev arms, respectively.
机译:目的:在肝切除术后向辅助性肝动脉输注(HAI)中添加全身性贝伐单抗(Bev)并进行全身治疗,以增加无复发生存期(RFS)。患者与方法:将患者随机分配为HAI加全身治疗,伴或不伴Bev。如果在Bev组中获得1年RFS> / = 80%,则将对该方案进行进一步研究。在5周周期的第1至14天给予含氟脱氧尿苷加地塞米松的HAI。在第15天和第29天进行全身性治疗和Bev 5 mg / kg:奥沙利铂85 mg / m(2),亚叶酸钙400 mg / m(2)和氟尿嘧啶2,000 mg / m(2)输注2天(如果患者)接受先前的奥沙利铂治疗,然后使用伊立替康150 mg / m(2)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估算RFS和生存率,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。结果:两支臂具有相似的特征:同期发生疾病(66%vs 63%),多于一个转移(84%vs 74%)和无Bev相比临床风险评分> / = 3(50%vs 46%) Bev武器,分别。中位随访30个月,4年生存率分别为85%和81%(P = .5),4年RFS为46%对37%。没有Bev组与Bev组相比,一年期RFS分别为83%和71%(P = .4)。 38例患者中有零例胆红素> 3 mg / dL,而35例中有5例(P = .02),而无Bev组与Bev组相比,胆道支架置入为零,而四例患者(P = .05)。结论:肝切除术后在辅助HAI加全身治疗中加入Bev似乎并未增加RFS或存活率,但似乎增加了胆道毒性。没有Bev和Bev武器的四年生存率分别为85%和81%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号