...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Comparison of macrovascular invasion-free survival in early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma after different interventions: A propensity score-based analysis
【24h】

Comparison of macrovascular invasion-free survival in early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma after different interventions: A propensity score-based analysis

机译:早期中级肝细胞癌不同干预后无大血管侵袭生存的比较:基于倾向评分的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to compare macrovascular invasion (MVI)-free survival (MFS) at the three-year follow-up in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent hepatic resection (HR), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), or TACE combined with radiofrequency ablation (TACE-RFA). Materials and Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 828 patients who were diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A or stage B HCC. Of these patients, 116 underwent HR, 395 underwent TACE-RFA, 239 underwent TACE, and 78 patients received conservative treatment (control group). A validation cohort of 158 patients was included. The MFS and overall survival (OS) before and after propensity score (PS) matching were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results : The baseline characteristics between the control and TACE groups were comparable. MFS was higher in the TACE group than in the control group at the three-year follow-up (p = 0.0091), and OS was similar in the two groups (p = 0.0549). PS matching was used to generate 68 pairs of patients in the control versus HR group and 74 pairs of patients in the control versus TACE-RFA group (1-to-1 matched). MFS was significantly higher in the HR or TACE-RFA groups than in the control group (p 0.0001 (HR versus control) and p = 0.0001 (TACE-RFA versus control), respectively). Furthermore, for patients in the HR versus TACE-RFA versus TACE groups that were generated by PS matching, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MFS and OS were higher with HR or TACE-RFA than with TACE at three years. In the study, similar results were obtained in the validation cohort. Conclusions : MFS and OS were higher with HR or TACE-RFA than with TACE for HCC patients without MVI.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较接受肝切除(HR),经导管动脉化学栓塞(TACE)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者在三年随访中的无大血管侵袭(MVI)生存期(MFS) ),或将TACE与射频消融术(TACE-RFA)结合使用。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了828例诊断为巴塞罗那A期或B期肝癌的BCLC患者的病历。在这些患者中,有116例接受了HR,395例接受了TACE-RFA,239例接受了TACE,78例接受了保守治疗(对照组)。包括158名患者的验证队列。使用Kaplan-Meier分析评估倾向得分(PS)匹配前后的MFS和总体生存率(OS)。结果:对照组和TACE组之间的基线特征具有可比性。在三年的随访中,TACE组的MFS高于对照组(p = 0.0091),两组的OS相似(p = 0.0549)。 PS匹配用于在对照组和HR组中生成68对患者,在对照组和TACE-RFA组中生成74对患者(一对一匹配)。 HR或TACE-RFA组的MFS显着高于对照组(分别为p <0.0001(HR与对照组)和p = 0.0001(TACE-RFA与对照组))。此外,对于通过PS匹配产生的HR相对于TACE-RFA相对于TACE组的患者,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,HR或TACE-RFA的MFS和OS在三年时高于TACE。在研究中,在验证队列中获得了相似的结果。结论:HR或TACE-RFA的MFS和OS高于无MVI的HCC患者的TFS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号